UK --- should all immigrants who were granted british citizen since 1997 have their citizenship stripped off them?

Question

since 1997 is when labour's open door policy to eastern europe & the 3rd world began, we've had a lot of very undesirable people become british citizens, & those chickens have come home to roost w/ the immense terror threat we have now, w/ muslims going out to fight in iraq & syria, and having the right to return to british soil because they're "british citizens"...

maybe should cancel the british citizenship of every immigrant who has naturalised since 1997, & make everyone re-apply, only the worthy people should get their citizenship back, but anyone else -- especially like the above -- should be stuck on a plane, and deported.

Answer 1

the british invented concentration camps during the boer wars and like the americans interned innocent citizens during the war that had connections with the enemy or held other citizenships so it's a doable idea , poor old nazz hasn't heard of 7/7 2005 when buses and tube trains were blown up by muslim terrorists and 52 people were killed and nearly 800 injured some horrifically just going to work

Answer 2

No it won't help. Lee Rigby's killers were born here, think the parents moved here when Thatcher was in charge. Choudry was born here, well before 1997. The move will be very expensive, we have nowhere to put them, no one to man the camps, it will cause huge amounts of resentment, it will split up families, leave kids with naturalised parents uncared for, be an administrative nightmare to sort out the good and bad ( the 7/7 bombers were not all on watch lists and worked) and will just cause chaos. No government would go for it, not UKIP, not even the BNP could do it in reality.

Answer 3

The problem with revisionist history is that you're concluding things based on bad information.



The borders were always open, since the Colonial days, it's kind of how you build an empire, Thatcher put Globalization on the map(guess what the goal was there), and since then it's all just a Money-grabbing progression(had little to do with actual politics).



The stupidity of your 're-apply' law is that it'll cost you Billions, Billions the UK already doesn't have, so how bankrupt do you want to get, for that false sense of security?

Answer 4

I don't take a huge issue with denying re-entry to citizens who have gone to fight with ISIS/ISIL/IS, or whatever the hell they're called this week. I think it can be taken as read that you're not a fan of western democracy, if you go off and involve yourself with the puritan cult that thinks beheading people is a valid way to express your views.



However, I really take issue with the sort of knee-jerk politics that seeks to tar everyone in broad strokes. It's kind of weird that you choose an arbitrary date for your stable door law. I can think of two of the most prominent Shiite-stirring clerics who arrived long before 1997. Abu Hamza came here in 1979, under the Thatcher era open door policy and Abu Qatada arrived in 1993 with the open arms of John Major.



I really don''t have a problem with booting out people who are only here to foment hatred and cause trouble. Anyone else is a fellow human and welcome.

Answer 5

There is a much more efficient way of dealing with these terrorists, we stick them all on a prison ship and we drag it out into the antartic then we let the royal navy use it for target practice.

Answer 6

It's very worrying ... some of these radicals seem to come and go with impunity ... perhaps if it can be proved they went overseas on terrorist 'business' then all their social services could be stopped eg. no more free healthcare, free housing, free education ... !

Answer 7

-Of COURSE Not !! THEN there'd be Twice as many People filling English Prisons- as there would be Walking English Streets !! :o

Answer 8

You probably cant do that but you can change the policy.

Answer 9

Yes, that would be one solution, but the army would have to round them all up and place them in holding camps and BCR (BRITISH CITIZENSHIP REVOKED) tattooed on their arm for identification purposes.

None of this will happen until we return to a National based society and that means voting UKIP, abolishing the human rights act to be replaced with BRITISH RIGHTS ACT.

Answer 10

I don't agree with retrospective laws, that's the sort of thievery that allows people to steal pensions.

Answer 11

Of course not. No one should be made stateless for no reason, except the blind, mindless hatred of some imbecilic sub-humans.

Answer 12

Okay Adolf, whatever you say. Try not to let all of that power go to your head.

Answer 13

NO...WHY?......MOST are hardworking people..GIVE US A BREAK.................NOT all muslims and even if were....??? Some nasty people on here?!!!