clore333
2007-09-23 18:53:09 UTC
Given that hundreds of members of IVAW took part, as well as other veterans and active-duty soldiers, anti-war veterans surely outnumbered the entirety of the counterprotest.
Counterdemonstraters claim that they are not necessarily pro-war, but that they are just pro-troops. However, as troops passed them, they held signs and shouted at them, calling them "traitors, "commies", "moonbats", and the like.
Given their attacks on actual troops, including many who have served in Iraq, should we instead consider the counterprotestors just plain pro-war, and perhaps even outright anti-troop?