Question:
Why are most people in England so anti-immigrant?
2017-04-26 17:03:03 UTC
Why are most people in England so anti-immigrant?
44 answers:
?
2017-04-26 17:05:56 UTC
Because they take our houses, jobs and fail to assimilate into British society and adopt it's values or embrace our traditional way of life.
2017-04-29 19:33:39 UTC
it's not that we are anti immigrant we are anti stop taking everyone that has nothing to offer from the eu... there's now only a small percentage of skilled workers that come to the uk, the rest are just unskilled economic migrants that are happy to do anything 'cause even the lowest wage is an improvement back in some of these eastern europe countries... imagine the us having open border policies with south america, it would be carnage... well that's what's happening to us
2017-04-27 23:40:15 UTC
No they are not. Uk people are the most welcoming in the world!
2017-04-27 04:48:15 UTC
Edit Migrants to the UK everything was Fine in the UK London up to about 1955 then the Paki Muslims arrived causing Race Riots 1958



and since Joining the EU the Muslim Plague has taken over they dont Integrate they just take over and once they reach 10% in any Community make demands Like forcing sharia on us english people



well we have had enough Muslims out is my war cry and the sooner the better and i dont care where you are Born Muslims out Pakistanis Out Romanians out and taking your Beggars with you



Because they Hate us many Migrants only want our free NHS and the Dole

do you realy want people who beleive this is Norman Lving Next door to you

Muslims should be banned from all the western world all the Time they are Muslims



This is My standard Answer to inform People with Children look after Your Children because Muslims Believe this is Halal ( LEGAL )



This is from a Muslim cults Priest MUHAMMAD, THE PROPHET OF ISLAM Said this



Thighing of children: Mohammed (51) married Ayesha when she was SIX, but as she was too small to consumate, he practised the sacred rite of Mufa’ Khathat (otherwise known as ‘thighing’) whereby he rubbed himself between the tops of her thighs, but did not enter. 



A man can quench his sexual lusts with a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate her But. Sodomizing the baby is halal (allowed by sharia). this says it all



If the man penetrates and damages the child, then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl, however, does not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister. It is better for a girl to marry when her menstruation starts, and at her husband's house rather than her father's home. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven."



“It is not illegal for an adult male to 'thigh' or enjoy a young girl who is still in the age of weaning; meaning to place his penis between her thighs, and to kiss her.”



"Young boys or girls in full sexual effervescence are kept from getting married before they reach the legal age of majority. This is against the intention of divine laws. Why should the marriage of pubescent girls and boys be forbidden because they are still minors, when they are allowed to listen to the radio and to sexually arousing music?"



MUHAMMAD, THE PROPHET OF ISLAM



"A man can quench his sexual lusts with a child as young as a baby. However, he should not



penetrate her But. Sodomizing the baby is halal (allowed by sharia). this says it all



Muslim Males want Sharia for One reason their Male advantage 



if a Muslim males Kills a Non Muslim under sharia law and says he refused to Convert No Crime has been committed



If a Muslim Beats his wife Sharia 64.5 tells him How No Crime has been committed 



If a Muslim Male marries a baby under Sharia 65.4 No Crime has been committed 



and under sharia is is a Muslims Oath to convert everyone 



and Mohamed if the Infidel Unbeliever does not Convert he must Die 
2017-04-26 23:11:06 UTC
They tire of muslims taking jobs,but not assimilating to english culture
Cousin
2017-04-26 22:50:28 UTC
Smarter than continental Europeans who gave their lands away to pushy Muslims.
The First Dragon
2017-04-26 18:10:47 UTC
It's just that there are so vey many immigrants to a relatively small country.
USAFisnumber1
2017-04-26 17:22:57 UTC
They are not. What they are is not willing to have people come into their nation and tell them that they (the people of the nation) have to change to rules and customs of the immigrants.
PoohBearPenguin
2017-04-26 17:18:32 UTC
They aren t. It s just that the anti-immigrant ones are the loudest.



Look at the US with the Trump supporters. They re in the minority.
2017-04-26 17:17:49 UTC
Many reasons.



Perhaps the biggest reason is we have had far too much immigration for far too long. Taking in 300,000+ (and I'm being conservative with that figure, it's often been MUCH higher than 300k) immigrants a year is not sustainable, and it's not good for us in the long run economically and especially not socially.



Many of our immigrants come from third world and Islamic countries, these people are NOT ethnically, culturally or in any way similar to us, they tend to recreate the conditions of their homelands here and turn large areas of cities into ghettos and cesspits, and these ghettos are closed communities. It should not be a surprise to anyone that high rates of honour crime, FGM and extremism come from these communities.



I notice on here that many of the biggest immigrant supporters seem to come from areas of the UK with low levels of immigration such as Scotland or Liverpool which are nowhere near as "diverse" or "multicultural" as Birmingham, London, Leicester etc.



The majority of the country is certainly NOT fine with mass immigration, despite what people like Nathan think. See link in comments.
2017-04-26 17:04:25 UTC
Are we?

I don't think we are.
2017-04-29 18:23:04 UTC
Look at France! They come for their own benefit, not wanting to socialse or mix with the majority. Their English is horrible.
2017-04-29 11:33:39 UTC
Google asylum, mjgrant rape, europe , australia, etc
2017-04-27 19:01:57 UTC
No.
Graham S
2017-04-27 13:49:29 UTC
Because they were immigrants 30 years ago
2017-04-27 13:38:15 UTC
They're wising up
2017-04-27 10:50:28 UTC
Clearly not "most people", since the Brexit vote was very close, 48% to 52%. (On the assumption that those who voted for Brexit did so at least mainly against immigration)
?
2017-04-27 09:27:25 UTC
most people aren't anti-immigrants. Just anti immigration policy forced upon us from people who we didn't elect.



The supposed intelligent people cant seem to understand that difference. And the people really sick of the influx of immigrants are the ones having to deal on a daily basis the negative effects of open borders. Remember the immigrants aren't moving into the affluent, middle class areas, they're moving into the poor working class areas, where the people have very little money, oppourtunities or help, then all of a sudden a lot of immigrants get placed there and get more help then those who have needed help.



Cant you empathize with the frustrations?
2017-04-27 09:07:58 UTC
The place is England in name only - or do you really believe the north sea is in the third world !
?
2017-04-27 08:40:23 UTC
Most of the immigrants are foreigners.
Jas B
2017-04-27 01:00:47 UTC
They are not, the BNP proved that, being the most anti immigrant party in recent elections, where they have never even got 2% of the total vote.
?
2017-04-26 21:17:53 UTC
People in England are fed up of immigrants getting resources for free which British taxpayers are paying for.
2017-04-26 21:15:21 UTC
Not anti-immigrant, anti-demographic suicide.
2017-04-26 20:39:42 UTC
Because they're ignorant.
Nosey
2017-04-26 18:40:24 UTC
It's not that we are anti immigrant we are anti stop taking everyone that has nothing to offer from the EU. There is now only a small percentage of skilled workers that come to the uk, the rest are just unskilled economic migrants that are happy to do anything because even the lowest wage is an improvement back in some of these Eastern Europe countries. Imagine the US having open border policies with South America, it would be carnage. Well that's what's happening to us
?
2017-04-26 18:00:03 UTC
Not anti=immigrant, just need more control over it as other hypocritical countries do.
2017-04-26 17:53:56 UTC
I would refer you to Maria's excellent post. Sums it up for me.
2017-04-26 17:45:42 UTC
Basically because the media have found immigrants as easy meat when it comes to sensational headlines to sell papers.

People want to read what reinforces their own prejudices and feel better blaming immigrants than facing the truth of their own shortfalls.

Throughout history immigrants have been the scape goats used by the masses to blame someone else.
2017-04-26 17:10:15 UTC
Most are not.
2017-04-26 17:07:35 UTC
Because of abuses from immigrants.
2017-04-26 17:04:11 UTC
It's because of the history of conquering other countries. Now, everyone realizes that once you annex a country, you have to take care of its people.
Kevin7
2017-04-27 21:23:38 UTC
They are not ant-iimmigrant,they do not want to be overwhelmed by immigrants
?
2017-04-27 15:06:08 UTC
Possibly some people are with good reason but not that they are racist. While people sleep on the streets, pay ludicrously high rents for slum conditions and are daily under threat of eviction and can see no end to this as the government simply is not tackling the situation. Plus the NHS is at breaking point and social care is a joke and many working poor are using food banks, is it really surprising. the thing is that it is far easier to see immigrants as the problem rather than placing the problem squarely where it belongs, that is on the shoulders of an uncaring government.
vic
2017-04-27 10:54:26 UTC
Because we are becoming increasingly pissed off being taken for mugs by the freeloaders of the World.We English are amongst the most tolerant people but there is a limit to our generosity and that limit has been reached.
2017-04-27 09:25:40 UTC
They're sick of the ghettos created by champagne socialists who don't have to live amongst them
?
2017-04-26 22:18:41 UTC
is it more true to say that only 10% of the entire population of Great Brittan is immigrant? and is it not more true to say, that most of the population of England is integrated?

just as only a small part of the population of Great Britan is immigrant, non-English or second-generation; the number of Englishmen in G.B., 37.6 million, who are anti-immigration is a small percentage.
?
2017-04-26 22:00:44 UTC
Because they come over here get given houses and get paid money for free. The ones that earn a living are fine. It's like the neps.
Twitter#17
2017-04-26 20:59:32 UTC
Best answer is of course Nathan lolz-



i love his [true] stories about his youth in Australia- and he has lots of old photos when he was the scourge of those England scruff that flooded into Australia and his neighbourhood- which was apparently very Italian- he was a handsome young bugger too with long hair and always in good quality denim shirts- he looked like that del <>amitri singer



he was protecting his 4 sisters Nathan is [very] very protective over women

you should see him at aged 15 and 16- i mean he would have been the local heartbreaker 1970s for deffos- and can still stop or start wars with a look you can,t ignore- and he was over here by age 18- taking a 21 year old back- 2 years later - a Scots nurse he loves bloody nurses! lolz



Nathan is an emigrant immigrant emigrant immigrant emigrant- a cool man! xx

people ask Nathan where are you from?- and he always answers with -"when"?
2017-04-26 19:36:03 UTC
I do not think they are , many just do not like open door immigration and have a hard time relating to , say , Arab women changing the mood of the streets with their weird clothing customs and foreign language which will always look rude and set them apart from the rest of society , such as white Brits , gays , British Jews or British Blacks .

I feel people in places like England , France and Sweden want their own culture to predominate .
2017-04-26 18:11:49 UTC
My attitude is like a person on a diet: I'm not anti-food, but I don't want wave after wave of pie and chips. Followed twelve helpings of apple pie, then four litres of orangaid, then ....



Hope you get the metaphor!
Who
2017-04-26 18:03:01 UTC
cos most are stupid

to them immigrants = anybody who comes into the UK

and leaving the EU will stop them



What they dont understand its



there are 4 groups of people who come into the UK

1) immigrants from the EU

2) immigrants from the rest of the world

3) illegal immigrants

4) refugees



THE ONLY thing that leaving the EU will do is stop 1)

it will have zero effect on 2),3),4)

in fact its likely to increase 2) (cos india has already said that to get a trade deal with india the UK MUST loosen the restrictions on indian immigrants - and other countries have also indicated THEY will want the same thing)



second thing

at the moment france is preventing a lot of illegal immigrants getting to the the UK via calais

After exit they are VERY likely to stop doing this

so what happens?

3) increases

you think the UK can just send them back to france? - No they cant

1st thing

the only thing those immigrants have to do is claim asylum

Under UK laws and UN rules their claim must be assessed - This has NOTHING to do with the EU law

So where are they gonna live until their claim is heard and who is gonna hear it?

cos at the moment there are no places for them to stay and be monitored, and very few staff to hear them



suppose their claim is rejected what then?

!s thing

I bet you will see a big increase in lawyers who will appeal against the rejection - so delaying the verdict and requiring extra courts to deal with the appeals.



suppose their appeal is rejected

Under UN rules they can ONLY be sent back to their native country or a country who will accept them



But suppose you dont know their native country (cos they aint got any identification) and cant prove they come from it?

You cant send them back anywhere- so here they say



even worse -

SInce there in now no reason for france to prevent illegal immigrants getting to the UK there is an incentive to the rest of the EU to "encourage" illegals to travel to france



result is

1) may now be zero , but both 2) and 3) have increased



i.e leaving the EU has made f//k all difference to immigration
2017-04-26 17:23:30 UTC
we aren't - but we object to EU NWO sending us a tsunami of immigrants with the a goal to replace indigenous Brits





what are you a Zionist supremacist ?
2017-04-26 17:12:55 UTC
Because they don't have to let anybody in that they don't want to.
?
2017-04-26 17:10:37 UTC
Because too many criminals are coming into England with the wave of refugees.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...