Question:
Why would celebrities give financial support and be spokespersons for a group that was named a terrorist?
kenoplayer
2008-04-07 14:46:46 UTC
organization of criminal nature by the FBI in Feb. 12, 2002?

These famous people have supported this criminal group...

Dalai Lama, Richard Dean Anderson, Pierce Bronson, Martin Sheen, Sean Penn and William Shatner.

The criminal activities of this group consists of:

Sinking at least 10 ships.
They have been imprisoned and tried for commission of crimes on the high seas including maritime piracy.
They have thrown bottles of butyric acid on decks of ships, injuring crew members.
They have deliberately collided with ships, endangering the lives of the crews and damaging the ships.

If you don't believe me click on this website:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_Shepherd

Why would famous people support this?
Six answers:
Buzz Killington
2008-04-07 15:24:13 UTC
Regardless of what their causes are if an organization uses violent methods to make statements they're considered terrorists. Now these terrorists can be considered eco-terrorists for their focus is on environmental causes. They have claimed to have sunk 10 ships which is dangerous. The people in those ships may families to feed, and for an organization to attempt this is dangerous.



Although I support their purpose there's non-violent methods to doing this. If these animals are near extinction, or used for people to wear then they need to stop killing whales.
marven
2016-12-15 11:16:40 UTC
properly, Republicans, with a great push from Haliburton desperate to Sucker human beings and start up a conflict in a u . s . that did no longer have Terrorist's, with the exception of the Dick-Tater that replaced into in can charge, yet nonetheless had certainly no longer something to do with, or the potential to attack usa. He replaced right into a Bully and not something greater. Who replaced into universally hated via certainly everyone on the earth which contain Bin encumbered. So Republicans did Al-Quaida a great choose via taking him out. allowing terrorist communities right into a formally Secular u . s .. Bush has helped his families previous buddy (the Bin Ladens) via bringing concerning the destruction of the yank financial equipment with a pointless conflict in Iraq that has Bankrupted this u . s . Monetarily and Morally With Mccain in can charge, Osama Bin encumbered is conscious he will have no longer something to be stricken approximately and be loose to proceed the Kaous and worry, allowing Gullible usa to fall right into a state of complete Cooperate administration, aka. FASCISM. They worry Democrats, Democrats have a historic past of winning wars (WW2, WW1), no longer loosing them against genuine enemies. (Nam, Korea) they go with the "Crash try Dummy", to interchange the third String Cheerleader we at the instant have optimum us (unhappy isn't it) Why wasn't any of the 30+ individuals of His kin detained and puzzled like those supposedly terrorist suspects in Git-mo, after 9-11-01, fairly of being given the only flights allowed in US air area to whisk them to freedom and secure practices?
Tequila....
2008-04-07 14:55:53 UTC
they might not have known the whole story



perhaps they wouldn't if they knew



did you see the people who supported the mccans when their child disappeared? richard branson, peter green and they even met the pope .......and they are official suspects in the disappearance of their daughter ...... i haven't heard any famous person speaking up for them recently ...lol
Croaker
2008-04-07 15:02:40 UTC
why did Carter and Reagan support Bin Laden back in the 80's?
BUST TO UTOPIA
2008-04-07 14:57:06 UTC
You forgot to mention the ships are out killing whales do in your question.
2008-04-07 15:05:38 UTC
they have to spend their money somewhere.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...