Question:
As responsible citizens, how should we react towards the verdict of the Ayodhya dispute?
Yahoo! India Answers CM
2010-09-23 01:24:52 UTC
As responsible citizens, how should we react towards the verdict of the Ayodhya dispute?
344 answers:
?
2010-09-23 01:44:19 UTC
We should respect the verdict whatever it may be and maintain peace, law and order in our locality. Rumors should be avoided and need to behave decently.



All political fanatics should need to understand that any kind of rioting will only make things worse. It will also bring shame to the whole nation and the their community in particular. Violence is not a solution to any problem. The dignity of the issue need to be cared.
2010-10-02 10:26:47 UTC
Very responsibly act. This is applicable to all civilized society. Never react to in any situations, every action happened, there will be naturally a reason to act first. We need not react to any particular situations without studying the reasons and its fallout for our reaction. In the Ayodhya Dispute, it is basically the question of faith, of a particular religion. A disputed site was there for a very long time, for which the present one or two generations are not responsible. We cannot correct a mistake done, perhaps happened or damaged deliberately or said to have been done centuries ago. For the same the reason, the present generation or the future generation should not have asked to pay a heavy price. , Court decision is pronounced, for which we are all waiting since 60 years, take the judgement as a road map at least now we know what is where. We the society have to find out. After studying in depth with experts opinions in hand the court declared that the party's in dispute share the place of worship in a manner they prefer. And it is clearly pronounced that there are traces of ruins and over there is a recent construction, and is assumed that by true spirit of Hinduism, considered that Lord Ram was born there, merely faith decided the fate.

LET US KEEP QUITE, CLAM AND GIVE PEACE AND HARMONY A TIME TO PREVAIL UPON.

Let us not hurt the sentiments of any sects/cast/creed or clan whatsoever, there reasons are, live and let live, always go with the saying GIVE AND FORGIVE. NEVER GET AND FORGET.
myke.vcn
2010-10-01 01:31:30 UTC
The best way to react to the verdict as responsible citizens, would be to accept it the way it is. The court has produced to us, a solution sort of a verdict. If it had been giving the whole plot of land to a particular client, then it would have been considered, in someway or the other, and by someone or the other, biased and that the verdict is not true. Producing a verdict like this, has made everyone to think upon that, all the religions need to co-exist with each other, without any hatred towards each other. So better accept it how it has been declared.
Reality lOOsing
2010-09-29 11:13:28 UTC
The Ayodhya dispute has become a political, historical and socio-religious debate for all of us.

after so much sufferings we indians have to save our country from the evil by staying calm and accepting the decision.

As they await the High Court verdict on Ayodhya, political parties and social groups have begun discussing whether there is still some scope for a consensus among the stakeholders.

Litigation may not offer a perfect solution because one or the other party is likely to lose out.



but we have just to accept the fact - the truth and should have to remember that we we all are INDIANS, before being hindus and muslims.
ironman
2010-09-28 21:54:51 UTC
As responsible citizen, one should be above ethnic and religious community groupings. Ayodhya dispute is really no dispute. Even if this is a dispute, this is for decision with court. All should abide by the decision. If any party to the dispute feels aggrieved with the verdict, appeal can be made to Supreme court of India. General public, especially responsible citizens should not bother about so called Ayodhya dispute as this does not affect people.
mjj
2010-09-24 06:34:19 UTC
The Ayodhya dispute is decades old. So far it has not been possible to find an amicable settlement in the matter between the concerned parties. As for that matter, it is not clear who is the proper authority to represent the entire hindus/muslims of India.



Under the circumstances the only solution to the problem seems to be to accept the court verdict with a full and open heart for the benefit of the country, the communities concerned and the Indians at large. Of course that well manifest the maturity and good sense of the people of this country and will enhance its greatness.
2010-09-30 22:10:16 UTC
The High court of Allahabad Lucknow bench has passed a most correct verdict as it takes the ground realities into consideration.Credit goes to the people who have maintained calm and the police for ensuring law and order.As a responsible citizen, the prime duty is to ensure that the verdict is implemented to its logical conclusion.The only bone of contention that may now remain is the splitting of the land equally into three parts.For harmony and peace ,if the sunni wakf board could be persuaded to take an equivalent area much away from the disputed area and the Government takes steps in this regard ,the scope of friction and rancour if any would be reduced considerably and there would be Peace Shanti and Aman forever.Apurva 1 October 2010 Friday
Indychen
2010-09-27 22:17:37 UTC
The current ploy to delay the pronouncement of the verdict until the presiding judge retires, thus ensuring the entire case goes for a retrial, is certainly NOT the handiwork of 'responsible citizens'.

I am sure that many more of such delaying tactics are yet hidden up the sleeves of these 'responsible citizens'.

...If ever the verdict is delivered [I doubt it will ever be !], one thing is definite : Whoever wins or loses, the REAL loser will be Mother India, our homeland. I am only reminded of the lines from the Ram Dhun, which were so dear to Mahatma Gandhi :

'Ishwara Allah tere naam

Sabko sanmathi de Bhagawan !'

['Ishwar and Allah are BOTH but your name. Give everyone this good thought, oh God !']



Added 30/09 : Feel relieved that a verdict has been delivered - and no violence has ensued. But the judgement is leaving the door open for an appeal to the Supreme Court, and both parties seem interested to make full use of the option !

Oh God, when, where and how will all this end ?!
janaka
2010-09-23 22:49:24 UTC
We do not know what the verdict will be. Some beleive in favour of the Muslims others in favour of the Hindi.We must look at the question with or logic, not our emotions and the questions we should ask ourselves are these.

1. to whom did the land belong to originally.

2. Have Muslims and Hindis bothdeveloped and worked the land so that both groups could be benefitted.

3. Who has contributed more to the development of the land, both fifnancially, culturally, academically, horticulturally industrally and emotionally

4. Each group naturally being led primarily by emotions and going to say "we did." They must be excused

they are only human and reacting with their emotions and their pride. Many wealthy and educated people have worked for and on each side.

5. The judges are only human too and will attempt to follow the law as best they can interpet it based on the above 4 premises.But even amongthemselves it will be argued that whatever the verdeict is it should have gone thus and so.

6. When the decision is finally handed down today, there is goig to be anger and pain,but they must walk

through it. The Hindi and the Muslim must walk together, relgious tensions and cultural differences put aside, no matter how differe rent, to make Ayodhya a prosperous and peaceful flace for their children to grow in and further enhance the rapport that wantingly their parents will have started no matter what the decision.
srinivasan_balakumar
2010-10-03 09:52:35 UTC
Today (3/10/2010), there was a news item in the TV channels that Muslim leaders and Hindu sant belonging to Ayodhya who were party to the litigation, had a discussion and decided to solve the issue in consultation with the Chief of Nirmohi Akhara. They categorically stated that the issue is to be solved by spiritual/religious leaders and they requested the political parties including VHP to stay away from the issue. I think this is a correct decision on the right direction, which should have been initiated long back. Perhaps, such a decision was induced by the verdict of the Allahabad High court bench.
?
2010-09-24 03:27:24 UTC
For the time being verdict should be postponed as already our nation is going through common-wealth show and to make sure that it runs without any hassles is our foremost responsibility.. Right now there is need for peace and solidarity.

Ayodhya dispute is nothing but an ego clash between two religions. Whatever and whenever the verdict will be out, the other side is going to create problem. Better is to give order to erect both the religious structures side by side, so that we can set an example of one nation loving all the people despite their different religions. The other way round is to give Muslims and Hindus some other pieces of land to erect their respective structures and that disputed land should be used for some educational or recreation purpose.
Deepak Purohit
2010-10-02 03:52:58 UTC
As responsible citizen of India there should be no verdict still came on Ayodhya if you think this is a verdict then think about judgment "what is judgment ?"

Judgement cant consider about existence of structure.

Judgement should be time bound.

Judgement consider facts.

For this verdict think on certain points

Where should be an order from court for archaeological survey before 06/12/1992?

why should it take so much time?

From where the Hindu's know about that temple?

What was history of Hindu's & Muslim's as per there constriction temples & mosque?

Why Babar constrict that building?

Is that really a Mosque?

What dose Ku-ran tell about mosque & its constriction?

Was Muslim's leader in India follow the constitution?

Was Muslim's leader follow Ku=ran as constitution?
SS
2010-10-01 10:34:15 UTC
As a responsible citizen we should respect the Views of the Court without further dragging this matter into more worse conditions.



This case has already waited more then 60 years to close but as we all know If this way it has to be closed it would have been closed 60 years back.

People from the Hindu party & the people from the Muslim party are both going to get the Case to the Supreme court anyhow, & this is a fact that we all are aware of.



But as an Indian we must not support any of the groups & should stay neutral towards the Verdict. Its good that court has decided to give the 1/3rd part to each party. This is also not fare as in My opinion all three of them are not eligible to take that land.



People who spills blood and kills thr own brothers in the name of religion & for a piece of land are never Humans And that land is a holy land for both Hindus & Muslims, So a holy land is not supposed to be owned by Non-humanistic people like them.



That land should be kept by the govt & the govt can open school/hospital/orphanage/old age homes & other things in that much big land which all of them can enjoy without any fights.



But as the verdict is out now, we as responsible citizens of India should respect our honorable Court & its justice.
2010-09-27 00:31:32 UTC
Since 1947, India has given every imaginable privilege to these Muslims like giving hajj subsidy, declaring Urdu as an official language in India, allowing them to have their personal law board, have separate wakf boards, opening madrassas, and even reservations. In the last 63 years Muslim %age is continually on rise. We gave them so many privileges and never asked them to curb their population growth.

And see this is what you get in return that we can't even construct our temple at the holiest site of Hinduism.

Actually more than Mulims, eunuch Hindus are responsible for that who are suggesting to construct a memorial or something else on the site. I often think that what would have been the verdict had Muslims been 80% and Hindus 14%. Everyone knoes what would have been the verdict in that situation.



Actually majority of Hindus are coward and eunuchs and that's why they were enslaved for 1000 years and their this attitude of subservientness continues to this date. Why do you eunuchs always behave like that. Majority of Indians/Hindus are inferior I knew that but they are that much inferior I didn't know that. And I don't care about so-called peace.



Only and only a grand temple at the site is respectable solution. Actually those people who are suggesting otherwise will try to make a peace accord even with a person who rapes their mother and sister. Such people have no souls and such people deserve to be enslaved.
Chandulal
2010-09-25 22:40:38 UTC
We should abide by the verdict of the High Court or Supreme Court. If a decision is taken by the government, the controlling political party will have its own agenda. But since the decision is taken by the Court there is no reason to believe any bias on any side. Moreover there will be detailed judgement which will run in thousands of pages. Judges are not simply telling a verdict. They will spread out the reasons through which they reach into their conclusion.



So as a responsible citizens we have to strictly observe the decision and if you are not satisfied, you can go in appeal or revision against the decision of the court.
?
2010-10-04 03:31:26 UTC
it is injustice in the name of justice.

it is un fortunate that politics has crept in judiciary.

if Ram was born on this site than Muslims have no right to demand that sacred land.

but how did judges know that Ram was born there exactly under the central dom

fantastic

really fantastic

this is the eighth wonder of the world

court all over the world gives verdict on the basis of evidence and proof

and

never ever has any court in the world given a judgment on the basis of faith

if my son is a bad guy and i have a faith that he will be a good citizen in the next birth

shall i have the liberty to kill him in this world because i have a faith



really fantastic



judge says no mosque existed at the site

then

what was the demolition in 1992



check de judiciary of india

check the india
Saket Saumya
2010-10-04 03:25:19 UTC
We should not red our eyes. As the verdict came,some hindu people were not ready to accept the verdict. Are these the qualities of a responsible citizen? In order to promote social peace and harmony,we should be satisfied whatever the decision has been taken.We should respect the judgement as the decision is in favour of both the communities.
gayathri
2010-09-30 07:22:42 UTC
We should not act. This is a matter of religious concern and not regarding some constitutional right. The ayodhya issue seems to be sorted out in a "please all" way, that was the best the courts cud do in such a situation. In a country where different religions and tribes co exist, there is always a chance of misunderstandings on certain issue.



As responsible citizens we should neither comment favorably nor unfavorably. Just carry on with our regular course of work and not hype it too much
2010-09-28 10:49:20 UTC
construct a mosque and a temple there. Tats the right thing to develop peace and increase secular ideology in mind of all Indians



why 6 decades for this ? even 6 min are more than enough for a verdict on this i think.Any how there should not be any riots and deaths on Ayodhya after 3.30 pm 0n 30 sep 2010 , the day of verdict.
thegentle Indian
2010-09-26 00:32:45 UTC
After undergoing through the legal and meandering process of law, the case has finally come up before the Supreme Court of india-- the apex cout of this country.



As responsible citizens-- people who behave in a responsible manner, behave in a mature manner, and accept the verdict of the highest authority-- we must accept the decision with grace.



In any game of sport-- be it Football, Hockey, or Tennis-- only one side is the winner, however much both sides want to be the winner!

In any war too, only one nation can be the winner.



So also, the verdict may be in favour of only one --the Hindus, or the Muslims.

It will be seen soon who behaves responsibly.

In this context, the Serenity Prayer is very helpful:



GOD, Grant me the Serenity

To accept the things I cannot change,

Courage, to change the things I can,

And Wisdom to know the difference .
COROLLA
2010-09-26 00:18:08 UTC
We know its a passion for Indian politicians to take religion as a game and play with people's sentiments. Its like playing cards for them. They will NEVER crush into it. Infact, they are going to take many lives just by divide n rule, double game, etc.

Being an Indian, first of all 1 should not hear what they say. I am a hindu and I don't have any problem if they construct a mosque. After all its a religious place and every religious place is Pure. If all citizens will say to each other "Its your place too, so you too have equal right as I have", there would b no communal riots...........God didn't say to behave in that manner, which is 1 and will b always. Only his name changes, and this name is damn given by us. Whatever b the past, if we don't able to understand that those were the Human Beings who created such a mess. So, why to punish the new generations ???
Moni
2010-10-04 07:09:32 UTC
The Verdict raises some more questions :

1) Why only court decides ?.... the elected MP's are useful in-fighters.



2) Why not abolish the Parliament system for good legislation ? ... Let MP's talk in court only with President-elect being the Judge.



3) Was the proof of Mandir conclusive ? .... many Mandirs are lying disbanded in ruins ... Hampi, Vijaynagar, Khajuraho, ....



4) Why religions play with public sentiments and destroy Prayer place ? .... religion is a part of politics and grows with support from kings/politicians.



Some answers:

1) There are many such places where all religions pray at the same compound.

2) Economic support only can help such places.

3) Prayer places should also be connected with income generation and service towards knowledge.
challa
2010-09-29 11:11:57 UTC
Government is giving too much of importance to that issue. Media is behaving in a irresponsible way making the issue more and more critical by more publicity. They put mike infront of every Tom **** and Harry who goes on Roads and askes them to explain his view.

Utter irresponsible way they are adapting. They didn't have basic commonsense of protecting National Integrity. That way they add fuel to fire.when mike is given that fellow vomits every nonsense.

Ask any individual about Ayodhya issue. No body shows interest. what the bloody hell happened when the construction was dismantled . Earlier There was a Temple. Nobody can deny The History.

It is the habit of Kings to install something related to their Victory in that area. Babar being a pious

constructed Mosque knowing that there was already a Temple which is a place of worship.

See, even somebody climbs Himalayas also puts a Flag there as a token of their visit.

It dosent mean that That portion belongs to that person who visited it.

It is all foolish to attribute something unusual to an useless mosque where no prayers are offered by Muslims. what verdict can they give? somebody says if the verdict is not acceptable, aggrieved party can go to Supreme Court.

How foolish it is ? It is apparent that verdict given by court is not genuine. so again that community appeals Supreme Court.. Is it justice on the part of Supreme Court to re-verdict the verdict of lower court ? If so what is meaning of Brain used by Learned Judge of Lower court ? Please every body know that it is all Political to gain a vote bank. Naturally verdict will be given in favor of Muslims. Because Govt is afraid of them and their Votes. Hindus .. useless fellows. They never respect their religion and their Gods. They only do some mockery of their own religion. So it is not necessary to give judgment in favor of Hinduism.Kindly accept all Hindus. Me being a Hindu saying this. see media and movies , how Hinduism is exposed in a negative manner. All are enjoying and joking on that......
Anusha
2010-09-29 04:11:49 UTC
Well, this has been an ongoing critical dilemma and as responsible citizens, mainly the youth, we have to make sure we respect the SC judgment and maintain peace and harmony in the country. It is a fact that we have one of the best judicial systems in the world and its time we have gave it some due.



Another main factor, whatever the verdict is, is the fact that as a country India is just coming out of its shell and so far she is not doing it very well. This is by far evident by the way we are behaving in terms of being hosts for the common wealth games. We look like jokers in front of the world and that too in a time where we have to be a swiftly developing country we are certainly lagging behind. I mainly say all this because in case there is chaos in the country due to the verdict, its very unlikely that the games will take place in India and we would have given the rest of the world 2 valid reasons not to trust us to host any games and it will also come to light that we are an irresponsible citizen population who have a democratic republic and we still do not trust the decisions our leaders make. We elect them and whatever the consequences, we have to face them.



In conclusion, people of India have a lot of growing up to do....'UNITED WE STAND, DIVIDED WE FALL". Its about time, we lived up to our 'UNITY IN DIVERSITY'
Orphan
2010-09-25 22:50:57 UTC
I don't know what type of mind set these peoples have. Fighting each other for building a pilgrimage center. I'm not intended to repeat the pros & cons of this case and what both the religions says. Because you all are well aware about it and its consequences. If the court order is favor to one group, the other group will certainly make a riot, some time it lead to massacre.



So to prevent a problem from both side, what I suggest is-don't give that place to any group. Instead of a building a temple or a mosque, build a big beautiful garden there. A garden with charming flowers, water streams, birds, park for children, etc. Show great quotes from Quran & Ramayana in the park. It will be a real temple/mosque for all kind of people with out any restriction. A paradise for all. We can show our unity to the world not by words but through this.
rsudarsanlic
2010-09-25 09:43:00 UTC
The demolition was a blot on Hindu tolerance. Hence the reconstruction shall be the best solution. Along with that, a temple for Lord SriRam should be propsed and started. Soon the popularity of the temple will give way to the ugly memories. This will boost the image of India as a secular country.



All citizens shall have a fundamental right to worship and also a fundamental decree that they shall not disturb other religions, in the form of insult, conversion etc.
?
2010-10-01 01:03:59 UTC
I am a Hindu in India.We have lot of duties to see.Lot of improvements to make.

Our Lord birth place is Ayodhya. Yes it is and judgement clarified the the entity.

If some one occupies for more than 12 years without any rent,he has been given more

rights for that place.

Babar the damager of our country has ruined many places of worship.

But past is past.The judgement is to be acceptable by every Indian with kind heart.

Already the common man suffered lot with terrorism,but not politicians.

Do not let them to make politricks with this issue.

Let us plea the contenders not to move to Supreme court and do not make a wait for another 10 years to get final verdict.
v_kshemkalyani
2010-10-01 00:41:36 UTC
The delivered by the Allahabad High court is quite judicious, and has shown any undue bias to any religion or sect, and tries to make out a just solution which could be satisfying to both parties in the issue. Therefore, we may salute to the verdict. The Govt.of India also must act on the directions given by the high court, after the 3 month's time of status-quo is over, to implement all the directions given in the verdict.
Sameer
2010-09-29 23:24:33 UTC
Take the verdict in a way, to give respect to the law of our country. Lets not get disturbed by the dirty politicians, who try to make an issue out of it, or try to divide the people etc. After the verdict lets thank that atleast a verdict has come rather than keeping it pending for all along the century. Each one should understand that any disturbance will only affect the public and the dirty politicians will try to find a gain out of it. Lets pray that my country India and its citizens should not be affected by this verdict.
balu
2010-09-24 09:23:28 UTC
There is no dispute with general public of India. This is created by some handful politicians Hindu as well as muslim to Create vote bank. Time has come to rethink whether we are fit for democratic government? I am surprised government is giving holiday to schools and all. Government is a sovereign body, should have guts to face any situation. Tomorrow if Pakistan attacks with nuclear weapons can we sit and weep? Should be ready for all eventualities but try for the good of the people. Hammer those who do not respect the judgement and create complications. A temple or a mosque will not change the destiny of this great country nor will feed millions of poor people.
Sisir
2010-09-26 00:21:01 UTC
As a responsible,law-abiding citizen of India,We must respect the verdict of the Ayodhya issue. One must not do anything which disturb the peace, harmony and tranquility of the Nation. We must not forget that we are Indians. Same blood flows in the vein of our brothers,We should not be fanatic and emotionaly misleaded. All of us should take the resposibily to maintain our National Heritage.
Pradeep
2010-10-02 04:50:52 UTC
We should simply accept the verdict. The judges have declared the verdict only after listening to all parties. Being a good citizen, we should respect the judgement and move on to the path of success. Going to Supreme court means taking a deviation from success and going towards darkness.
pattu
2010-09-29 23:26:36 UTC
As a citizen of India, all have to respect and obey the orders of Justice. But there is only one question lying underneath. Ayodhya was the birth place of Srirama from where he ruled as Ramraj.There was no muslims in Ramraj, as they came afterwards only. If they were present at that time, Srirama would have treated them with respect and let them live peacefully. Present day there is no Ramraj or dharma anywhere.
shibashis
2010-09-26 05:50:15 UTC
Actually we should not react at all if we are to call ourselves responsible.



But of course I would be happy if the verdict supports neither parties and decides for a non-religious or multi-religious construction at the site. Despite being a Hindu by birth (I feel I don't need a religion to tell me what to do, as the corrupt people or rapists out there are religious too) I feel Babri Masjid should be restored because the fact remains that in 20th century the only two cases of open vandalism are the destruction of Bamiyan Buddha by the Taliban and our Babri masjid.
?
2010-10-04 13:12:55 UTC
Before the Verdict, i felt so sad because i thought the Verdict will kick start another riot which will break me from my brothers and sisters apart.But godwillingly, everythng went well and we proved one again as a strong Secular Nation which still promotes Unity in Diversity.I am really really proud to be an Indian.The way the nation handled the situation was really fabulous.

HATS OFF TO ALL INDIANS.
joe_little32
2010-10-04 05:19:54 UTC
lLook we have come out of our childhood days. We have entered the 21 Cent. We all know that there is one and only one supreme power which controls the happening of this universe. Some call this Power as God, Bhagwan, Allaha. What I feel is that we humans have given this supreme power a name of our choice because we prefer to know this power as such. If we really take a close look at our beliefs with an open and receptive and open mind, holding our age old beliefs at bay so as to not to let it influence our thoughts, we can a lot of similarities in the religions that is Islam, Hinduism and Christianity. To name a few which are clearly obvious viz, Birth of the Power whom we know as Allaha, Jesus and Krishna, we find all of them taking their birth in the middle of a stormy night in unexpected such the Desert, Manger and in Jail. All were declared as the enemies of the ruling King and orders were given to kill all the new borns. All escaped death and later became religious leaders. Hindus are known as idol worshipers, if one looks carefully at the two religion one will find them to be the same (NO OFFENCE MEANT) Muslims worship the direction in which the Holy land is located, Christians worsip the cross with crucified figure of Jesus on it. I have seen embroidaried picture of the Madina which is placed in westerly direction and the member praying in that direction. My own sis-in-law is married to a Muslim. All followers of these three religions cleanse themselves before entering the worship place.There many more similarity which I could quote but as that is not the purpose I would say if there is only supreme power then the place of worship should hold the same importance and there like intelleget human being we should accept the judgement in the fair spirit of a sensible human being and believing in the values of humanity accept and behave in the right manner in which a sensible human would
V Narayanan
2010-10-03 22:12:37 UTC
Hi

We need to accept the very fact that Islam, Christianity, etc., are foreign religions which spread in India because of Invasion and Business. It is belief of Hindus that Rama lived in Ayodhya and the disputed land is Ram Janma Bumi. We can't fight over this fact and belief. But we need to see what we gain and lose if we cease our fight over the land.



By sacrificing that land (even if a muslim believes he owns it for the allah) none of the muslims would lose anything. Rather it would promote harmony and co-operation amongst the population.



If Hindus sacrifice the land as they are used to; then also nothing would happen.

We Hindus have high heritage of sacrifice; why should we fight for a destructible land and building; we can built a temple in our heart and live a life of "Ram-Das" which is very hard to be cracked by any intruder. No one can destroy the temple of our hearts.



Hence, I firmly believe one of the party - Hindu or Muslim should stop fighting and think about for what they have to fight. All that born or made is to die or get destroyed except the spirit. Hence we need to promote our spirit of devotion more than the place of worship. If we understand this - there is no need to fight.

Yours

VN
?
2010-10-02 02:42:30 UTC
The judgement delivered by Lucknow Bench of Hon'ble Allahabad High Court should be given due respect. It should not be chalanged furthermore in Supreme Court. Let Hon'ble Apex Court render its opinion on other issues. This dispute can be solved with mutual acceptance of both communities, which does not seem far away. The only barriers in the way are likes of Shri Mulayam Singh Yadav and Shri Ram Vilas Paswan, who will do any damn to deviate the muslims from real issues and education to grease their communal politics. You can understand the view of Bukhari and other Imams, as they are predictable.We should accept the verdict in its true spirit and try to create a consensus. Media should also restrain from publishing the statements, aiming to create bad blood among communities.
?
2010-09-28 20:24:41 UTC
This time both Hindus and Musliams are aware of the happenings after the verdict. That is why they organised meeting among themselves not to resort in any violance protests etc.

It is a different matter if any hard core elements indulge in some violance. Otherwise I do not expect any untoward incident.



As far as I am concerned, whatever the verdict, the Upper Court i.e., Supreme Court is always there for appeal.
?
2010-09-28 01:52:39 UTC
We should respect the verdict and should not give an uncessary hype to the issue Because since the HC have decided to give the verdict some the Tv Channel have made it their main Story and showing unnecessary shows/ interviews about it.We all should rewspect each others sentiments and work for the betterment of society. There are so many things do to please God and not the only way by making mosque or Temple.
?
2010-09-26 07:19:28 UTC
We must respect the law of our country as Indians. If we are patriot then we will respect the verdict of the court. Where do we stand? If are patriot we will respect the verdict of the court whether we like it or not. Then we will accept it. And that is what we must do. If the court says it is the birth place of Lord Shri Ram we must accept it and if the court says it was never the birth place of Lord Shri Ram and that Babar had not destroyed any temple and built a mosque then we must accept it as a mosque built by Babar. I am sure the Indians today whatever faith they propose they are an enlightened lot and they would not like to harm the peace and harmony over any issue in this country. We can control our emotions and guide them towards productive process and not be carried away by any rhetoric from anybody and entertain religious leaders or political leaders or any NGOs who are inclined in one direction or the other through agitations or bandhs etc. As a True Indian We Must Accept the Court Verdict and not promote political interference in this matter.
Sharms
2010-09-24 07:32:22 UTC
We have to ask ourselves. Should We react?Must we react?How important has Babri issue been to the majority of Indians. Does it effect our lives lives?React to a verdict -we can do nothing about.

Who does it effect?Politics.Who in the politics?Those who want attention,prominence.Those poor good for nothing souls who hav nothing to do in life. Who waste their time,and public money,peace and time.



Their should be NO verdict at all. It should be an NEVER ENDING CASE.So that this trouble monger generation is dead and forgotten.The new geration I hope will be more sensible and not waste their time on dilapitated issues

Why Babri Masjid verdict alone.?What about Satyam verdict?Raju verdict?

What about Harshad mehta verdict?What about our latest-the CWG verdict? The Kalmadi verdict?...endless! We were cheated.Are we waiting for these verdicts that have directly or indirectly effected our lives.Noooooooooooo!



As a responsible citizen I am venting my anger on net where 3-6 of you will read. Thats a lot of resposiblity isnt it. !

As a responsible citizen You and I do nothing.We shouldnot CARE what the verdict about the dilapitated Babri Masjid will be. Neither should we care whether a temple or mosque is built there.

What should bothers us is that we are tolerating too much OPEN corruption.

Unless people are punished for cheating and hurting the pulic -this country will very soon hang its head in shame.

May be then I might dig up old graves and dicuss issues on national network.....as an expert!



See as a responsible citizen I have reacted calmly and passively! ha ha ha
Ramasubramanian A
2010-09-23 09:31:23 UTC
There is no need to "react" The Courts, the Hfgh Court and later the Supreme Court, will give their judgment based on facts and information presented to them and availbale with them. All trhe people should accept whatever the judgment and move on. If it is not accepted now, it cannot be settled even for centuries. The politicians and the religious leaders should not make an issue out of it for gaining cheap political and personal mileage. There are many more urgent matters for the people and one more masjid or temple is not going to make any difference. The common man wants peace and security in life and nothing more. I am gladdened by the response of almost the answerers to the question who say that all should accept the verdict and not create any trouble. That shows the inner strength of our general population.
?
2010-10-04 21:45:02 UTC
i dont know what the verdict was but i would ask both sides to please remain calm.



let both hindus and muslims pray to their own god, and live life in peace. someone has to be the bigger man. if hindus are getting the place, let muslims be calm.



n if muslims are getting the place, let hindus be calm.



im a muslim, n i know ayodhya is a hindu place.



personally, if i were an imam, i would tell the muslims to not fight and give the place to hindus.



but that's just my opinion. let us all live in peace and in brotherhood.



the commonwealth games are here..

lets show the world that india is united as a nation.

you see america is united states of america.



let's strive to make india more great.
?
2010-09-24 05:41:05 UTC
Ruling out that there will an amicable solution on Ayodhya title suit, it is likely that neither Hindus nor Muslims would agree to it. The Hindus are committed for construction of the Ram temple in Ayodhya and whatever is being done is just a "timepass". At this stage there is no chance of an amicable solution on the dispute,
2010-09-24 02:23:13 UTC
Here the the question is not the verdict of supreme court,but law of natural justice.Whether babar has constructed by encroching in to ram temple or bhajrang dal pushed their way into babri masjid, with out the consent of the other party,it is not good, and is a bad practice. Who ever have encroched into other's place will never leave the place,and it is so funny they fell more attracted and fassinate towards the encroched land or property than they accquired through righteous process.See Ravana has shown more interest in Sita as he abducted her and that is why he used to visit her daily and keep nagging her to marry him , which is not righteous, and brought his own peril and his dynasty as well.

Same way the story of Helen of troy,Cleopatra etc.etc.



Leave about old stories in the recent past also there are so many instances where the encrochers have not left the place of encrochment even today,and if atall they left that is after heavy losses on both sides, Few recent past historical incidens which every body know are ennumerated below but may not be chronologically but as it entered in to my mind.

1.Vietnam once a frech colony was noreleased by france though they were defeated by locals but was handed over to U.S for continuing the atrocities which was verily described in the book "CIA and it,s activities"written by exCIA Dy chief.

2.Same is the case with Kambodia.

3.South Korea is still under the survielance of U.S. is an open secret.

4.Gaza strip occupied by Israel is no more different.

5.Falk islands by england

6.Iraq by U.S.

7.P.O.K.

8.Chechenya bu Russia

9.Tibet by Chaina

In nun of the cases Indian government supported the Invaders or encrochers.

Very good.

Why the government is afraid of the facts as to who is correct who is not.

The sciene is so much advanced,archealogical department ,forensic department etc,etc. can scientifically proove the facts.

If mosque was constructed by demolishing hindu temple it is nothing but encrochment and in the same way if temple was costructed where mosque was there earlier that is also encrochment.

As a national policy if you say the part of Kashmir occcupied by pakistan belongs to India and basing on the same policy lines whether it is a problem within the country or out side country you should support the correct party and make the other party understood what is the fact and also what is needed to be done at that time.

Let the Judicial department release the verdict with out any external pressures playing on their minds.
Amit N
2010-10-04 23:48:21 UTC
Well verdict is quite favourable to hindu & muslims community

O.k. if Sunni waqf board is willing to file suite at Honble Supreme court they can

but they will not get anything because even Supreme Court will not completely change the decision of Honble HIgh Court because three judge bench is agreed at one point, that place is the birth place of Lord Rama

now hindu and muslim community and their respective parties should come together & forward and can construct their temple and mosque at the same place just like at Varanasi
chintu
2010-09-30 07:39:49 UTC
First of all it is the best judgment in the history of India and it has given equal justice to all the 3 people as a citizens of this country we should respect the decision of the court with the interest of international relations of the country which should not affect by this issue and it also binding 2 different communities of the state, and also protects the interest of all the parties in this case and they even has 90days of time to think about this issue and react to wards the order of the court with in the period of limitation and go before the supreme court for better order but i do not think the order better than this .
?
2010-09-30 07:15:45 UTC
Keep up the secualr spirit and accept the verdict, whatever it is!



India is know for its cultural diversity. Just giving speeches on secularism cant make u a secular country..we've to prove that! and seeing this..where a country divides over a mere piece of land disheartens me greatly! This fight has been going on for a century now. Our reaction to the verdic will clearly show our maturity as a nation. According to me, the verdict is fair enough and should be accepted without any conflicts, keeping in mind the other issues India has to deal with currently. The main focus should be the Commonwealth Games, after all its a matter of India's self respect! This fight over a mere piece of land should now be buried...!! Indians, no matter what religion should accept the verdict and maintain their cool. And if ppl are insane enough to cause riots because of a piece of land, I pity my country men & women. I hope this won't happen....I hope the peace would be maintained! I am a proud Indian and if Indians would react maturely and calmly this time, we would know India has grown close as a nation! *fingers crossed*!



Moreover, none of the Gods would have wanted us to fight over a mere piece of land! Get over with it!

jai hind :)
Raghavendra S
2010-09-25 23:20:12 UTC
As responsible citizens of democratic country we should honour the verdict. And citizens accept it generally. But what about the politicians and others clouts who are eyeing on their vote banks and other such greeds.

In my personal opinion irrespective of the out come of the final verdict a common facility especially like a high tech Hospital with all facilities made available at a minimal cost should be constructed,

at this site and the facilities should be avaible to every one IRRESPECTIVE OF RELIGION OR CAST OR CREED
VenkiG
2010-09-28 06:10:31 UTC
The only reaction expected from everybody is " NOT TO REACT ". Just read the news. Do not watch TV channels airing the same news infinite times to make the people react and get more news for the next day. Stop watching 24x7 news channels and skip to 24x7 entertaintment channels. And we know the court's judgement is final according to the Constitution of India. There are so many places of worship in India where both the religions go without a tiny hesitation. Do not fall prey to something which you are definetely not interested.
2010-10-04 05:04:52 UTC
Ayodhya verdict is in the direction of maturing democracy in India . this verdict should be appreciated by all class,creed,race and religion. we people of India are not living in the era of 1992 when serials of Ramanandsagar was on high T.R.P.rate and people was worshiping even Arun govil actor of serial as well as not following fatavas from muslims clergy.so, this verdict is going to be a triumph of moderate Indians and we are enough mature to realize the consequences of unity of both community

http://gujarativichar.blogspot.com/2010/09/babari-demolition-national-issue-of.html
pinky_pratima03
2010-10-04 04:02:44 UTC
Compromise proposal for Ayodhya: Let the Hindus construct a temple, but the project must be led by Kalmadi."
Yama Dharma Raja
2010-10-03 04:22:07 UTC
The way we react at present indicates that Indian Citizens are and have been very very decent, responsible and gentle. It is only the politicians who create all problems. See what a minister has said about the verdict: 'The court has not justified the demolition'. One Chief minister has said that he was glad that provision has been given for appealing to the higher court. If problems find their way to solutions, the politicians could not survive. But the citizens have proved that they are really matured.
2010-10-02 05:21:25 UTC
In India we can found all Religions . So we can see temples, mosque and church in the same way. There is no any separation for other than hindus to make their worshipping places here . We always supported them because we believe in all religions, we respects all gods. Indians are bold with their minds, so that we never disallow any this for any cast or religion. The Place Audya is our epic place , we had the priority to keep it as our place. And now the dispute if find and allow a partition also for the other community, Here we had show our boldness and non separation again by this judgement. we can proud again about Our India, We never avoid anybody. We are accepting all.
Raja
2010-09-29 22:50:43 UTC
We should remain calm, irrespective of the Verdict. The concerned people wont subjugate after the verdict. But i am sure that taking this verdict as advantage, some anti-social elements show their presence in Vandalism. As india in the progressive mode, so we should not allow such anti social elements to involve in anything which impedes our progression. Thatswhat the responsibility that we as a citizen has got.
Mathuraiyar Mannan
2010-09-29 06:16:52 UTC
There is no place for violence in this spiritual issue. It is meaningless to to show any sort of physical disturbance over the verdict if it goes against. The lost party if it feels justice has been denied should go about firmly in legal ways to assert their case. *Responsible citizens should aid in this above process.*



No responsible citizen should instigate violence or start debates on the subject. On the contrary they should have a calming effect on others.
indus
2010-09-28 10:19:38 UTC
As a citizen one should respect the judgment , but both the parties are already on their way to move the issue to SC( even without knowing the favor of judgment ) ,, so hopefully there will not be any problem in day after tomorrow's judgment , but the actual problem may cause with some anti-gov people who may trigger religious problems during CWG , as usual .



if the judgment is favor of Hindus , will it be easy to build a temple ? as Obama said this will be a "recruitment bonanza" for Islamic terrorism , and vise-versa



According to me , either SC or president or whoever have powers ,Must declare the place as reserved and restricted area ,And better government build some monument for people (for all Muslims and Hindus ) who shed lives for that place , And make the place as common assert of our secular nation , to avoid future disputes.
Venkatesh V S
2010-09-25 19:17:52 UTC
It is tough to make no reaction. Reaction will be made indoors or outdoors or in the canteen talk, bus stop, etc..



The judge has to go the depth in the matter, and give out factual details. Rumor has it that some vital papers are missing and that the congress led govt. will give full support to the Muslims, their vote bank. In some Muslim location, they are preparing for the celebration.



It should be seen that India has more number of converted Muslims.



The worst reaction would be, if the issue flares up due to anyones favor then the CWG will also become an target, which will be an international issue.



I urge you to go to this site which will illuminate anyone-



http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate/tejo.html



http://www.stephen-knapp.com/true_story_of_the_taj_mahal.htm



The place belongs to Ram Janmabhoomi



"During their rule they looted and destroyed hundereds of thousands of Hindu temples. Aurangzeb himself destroyed 10,000 Hindu temples during his reign! Some of the larger temples were converted into mosques or other Islamic structures. Ram Janmbhoomi(at Ayodhya) and Krishna Temple(at Mathura) are just two examples. Many others exist!"
?
2010-10-02 23:03:40 UTC
Actually when I am sending this answer verdict is already out.

It is a very balanced and fair judgement and gives everybody equal land and responsibility.



I feel Hindus can help to build Mosque on land allotted to them and muslims should contribute to building of Ram -temple and spread message of harmony throughout India.



Let us open a fresh and happy chapter in Hindu-Muslim relations to end the dispute once and for all.
Ludovico
2010-10-01 23:30:07 UTC
Ending more than 60 years of trauma and wait, WE INDIANS at large have well-received the verdict. There should not be any more follow on and any differences felt must be only through amicable settlement or the country's Apex court. This verdict is not about any religion but about property rights. Politicians should be watched from whipping up passions and from opening up new issues for their political gain. God is one and our nation is one. Jai Hind, Jai Bharat.
?
2010-10-01 22:51:51 UTC
It was a wonderful judgement. The way the verdict came is really shows our judiciary system has done a great job. Also the people of our country has shown great respect in same. We all should celebrate and end the dispute.
?
2010-10-01 05:56:37 UTC
It Verdict Not a Law Judgment .It Is a Idols Of One Community
J.P
2010-09-29 12:21:54 UTC
Most of us in Tamil Nadu, India, wake up from prayer call made by Mosques near our homes as well as from Subrapatham voiced over load speakers from Temples.



Our Elders taught us to respect every religion, and we tolerate both calls even though we belong to different religions.



Sometime we also hear Cristian prayers during Good Friday time.

Every thing is in our mind only, and if we can think Allah, Jesus and Shiva are one and the same, we do not react to any religious any religious fanatics.



Whatever may be the verdict, Sun is going to raise from East, waves will be touching shores, nothing is going to change.



I will take it as if nothing has happened, because nothing is going to happen.



Jai Hind
2010-09-29 07:34:51 UTC
As responsible citizens we should consider this as a land dispute rather than a dispute between two communities. Why should we fight for some mishaps done by some senseless rulers in the past. Hindus & Muslims are one and should be one. Nothing should come in between us to spoil the peace and integrity of India.
Karan
2010-09-29 07:16:38 UTC
First of all we should maintain peace in the country. Even if the verdict goes against any of the two religions fighting against each other would not give benefit to them. so why fight?

as responsible citizens we should respect the verdict and stay calm
2010-09-28 07:20:11 UTC
There is no question of reactivg 2 a court verdict. Everyone whether he or she likes or not, has 2 obey the court verdict, bcoz judiciary is the supreme authority in a democracy. If the court wants it can prosecute a person who talks against its verdict. Normally it doesn't take action is another matter.
kishore_patil62
2010-09-24 08:05:24 UTC
Ayodhya dispute will be solved,there is more pressure on supreme court,decision will not be easily accepted by the ppl ,because emotional and religious attachment for this small land,so many ppl died for this ,so politician and the involved ppl must be punish.

both hindus and muslims ppls of india come together n decide,what to do with this disputed place.

if the decision goes in the favor of either the muslims or the hindus, again politician use the innocent ppl n pull them into fire of blind religious war.

so be clam,rest in our home n watch,what is the decision?accept that .

do not participate in shameful drama.
R K g
2010-10-03 22:56:57 UTC
The issue has been treated well to a logical balanced solution. However, on such matters it is impossible to satisfy both the parties..no judgement would have more neutral.



Please don't attach any identity to the issue or the people who have their vested interest in the matter. Any issue dies a natural death if every Responsible Citizen decides to drop it & give the matter zero value. Like it is said Bury the Past.....let the life move on.
?
2010-09-29 22:08:54 UTC
I just ask a simple question for how long we are going to fight for an issue which occurred a decade back? I think we have to give up all our ego.We should think about future and not the past.For example take Common Wealth Games issue.Indian can concentrate on these issues,which are asking questions on India's respect and dignity.So what i say is whatever the judgement be,we should leave it as such and we should not prolong this controversy.If I said anything wrongly i feel sorry.Thanks.
hurfunmoula
2010-09-26 07:07:02 UTC
a. Not be emotional about whatever the verdict might be

b. Start a National campaign that the legal owner of the land(who ever it might turn out to be) builds a National Integration Memorial on it , where all Indian Festivals are celebrated

c. Pledge on Ram Naumi and Id that no fight shall ever occur in the name of religion
nisha
2010-10-04 22:19:21 UTC
Before anybody tries to answer this question they should ask themselves that do they really believe that hindus and muslims are eternal n inseparable part of india Do muslims respect the hindu religions and traditions. Do Hindus feel the same for muslims as they feel for their own brothers or sons.

So when this issue came up how many of us hindus felt bad abt the masjid being broken and how many of us muslims felt bad abt the hindus being hurt. How many of us thought that our kids are watching wt are we giving them.

Thinking this makes us feel the pain of a muslim or a hindu. Then we can judge wat decision could the court make or wat other option they even had.

Every religion hindu or islam preaches love.

This could be the most peaceful decision keeping the nations peace in mind. I wish they dont go anywhere else for judgement coz this cud be the best.
Palani Chandra karthikeyan
2010-10-02 04:25:12 UTC
We have to move forward and not live in the past. We should approach Ayodhya with a open mind and should not get emotionally involved. The Gods can take care of themselves. If the Gods are looking upon men to solve their domestic problems, we do not need such gods. We should not be sucked in a emotional battle to fight someone's war.Let us Indians live harmoniously
@!
2010-09-30 09:53:19 UTC
I think there is no dispute among the commoners.....Not even among the local people living there...It is all being made into a big issue unnecessarily....We have lot of things to worry about...I wonder why people make big issue out of these religious and racial stuff....It doesn't make peace, it doesn't make a nation progress.Is this what we have to show by saying 'unity' in diversity?Where is the practicality of unity if people are not ready to accept each others' beliefs and stay in harmony?

As responsible citizens, we must work towards a better nation by doing what we say(not bad things- but i mean one must not be a hypocrite).So, "to make peace, we must have peace within ourselves", we must have respect for other religion,caste, creed.We must respect the law and abide by it.
star24_sb
2010-09-30 02:15:59 UTC
The Place ayothi, claimed to be Ram jenbhoomi? is it correct? Did Babar demolished a temple there? Is any proof for all the incidents? Let me tell you and pls kind enough to read and understand. The first thing that the so called Babar was a king who came to rule india as all the kings do. While his kingdom, he was particular in making his kingdom strong and he knew that it could be only done by a smooth relation between Hindus who were the majority. His last letter is one of a proof for the above statement. The BabarNaama is still there in the museum with the Govt. The letter wrote by Babar to his son Humayun stating that "My son! be kind to the hindus who are the majority to run the kingdom and also do not eat the meat of cow even it is allowed for us as Hindus are treating it as God". How then a minority king Babar would have demolished the temple there. Moreover there are scriptures still in the temples near the ayothi that thanks Babar for his contribution for building the temple. If Babar has done the demolition then he would have sent from the country by the Hindus,

but Babar, his son Humayun and his son Akbar were ruling one by one and it can be possible only if they have satisfied the Hindus that time by their kingdom. When was Rama born? how do we come to know about rama? when did people accepted rama as the avathar of Vishnu? We all know that Ramayanam is the only source for the rama. The Ramayan was written by "Valmiki" in sanskrit and that time only some few people knew about Rama. But Later when Tulasidhas translated the Ramayanam in Hindi, majority of Hindus came to know about Rama. Ramayanam says that Ramar was born in Ayothi, where a river called Sarayu was flowing. When we see the present ayothi we find no such river as said in the ramayanam. It says the river flows from east to west and mingles in Ganga river. But a river near to present ayothi which is 25 km approx is flowing west to east and its not joining with Ganga but some other. In Ramayanam its states that Seetha will go for bath to that river daily. How can seetha go for a bath from the present ayothi to the river situated 25km approx without a transportation just for bath. The river too is flowing from west to east and not as ramayanam says.Further if we see a geolegist has discovered that in Nepal there is a town called ayothi which is same as Ramayanam states. There is a river which is in the town itself and it flows from east to west and also joins with river Ganga. Further, Babar's activity was aggressively commented by Guru from Sikh religion lived at the same time duration. He has visited the Babar masjid and has revised its beauty and not any complaints stating that Babar has demolished the temple and built the masjid. No complaints or cases have been filed since Babar, Humayun or Akbar. Akbar was not a muslim and he founded his new religion called Deen Illahi and he was very close to HIndus. Hindus Rajaputhirars are his personal courtyard members. They might have filed a complaint to akbar that your father has done so and so.. And if filed then Akbar might have rebuilt the temple. So Ramjanmaboomi is in Nepal which is a Hindu country. This is the fact and the truth.



Any way both sides should accept whatever the judgement is.. Stay calm and no terrorism Plz save the innocent people..!
Shekhar
2010-09-24 10:28:47 UTC
At the very first place, let us not go into details of who and why the petition was filed years ago as that is history now. Having said that I am of the opinion that wheather a temple or a mosque is made subsequent to court's verdict, it would be the house of the same Allah whom we call as Ram, The Christ , The Nanak.
rabindranath r
2010-09-28 10:53:41 UTC
Accept the verdict with grace.



If you feel strongly and have sufficient reasons or evidences that the verdict was wrong take the next step of appealing to the higher court.



But please do not instigate or trigger off any violence. The poor will be the ones who will be more hurt.And the divide between the two concerned communities will only widen..
chell
2010-09-27 04:49:01 UTC
Of course we have to accept the verdict and be calm. If at all it is said they can appeal. what is there in appealing.. only acceptance. [But we indians had been invaded and had seen many atrocities on the unarmed Indians then and there. This is the only country that is having a separate religion. When we try to save even the rare species in the world , So this people also].
?
2010-09-25 11:56:46 UTC
I am fed of this ayodhya issue. With all the people killed around our country and abroad these politicians should feel ashamed to milk it further. Whatever is the verdict we should not react to it. I will continue to pray my God in my home , whatever is made at that place. I really don't care,what I care about is no innocent should die now.
ADMIRAL
2010-10-05 00:14:52 UTC
As a civilised society ,you have various agencies,Judiciary is one arm of Law,Judge is a person who makes a decision on a disputed problem,to remove the humen error you make a group of judges to decide a issue. In Ayodhya dispute either you would not have gone to court by deciding among the involved parties,Once decided to go to court ,You will have to have total faith in judgement & to accept it in totality by all parties involved.There is no scope of criticism or doubting judiciary.No outside agency/person to speak /instigate any party,If any point involved party feels strongly then they can go to Supreme court.All citizen,political parties,religious leaders,press to refrain from any comment/criticism,maintain harmony in society.Admiral V K Singh
2010-10-04 01:34:14 UTC
Okay, im not a citizen of india or anything, but i reckon, Ayodhya is Hindu land, Rama came before any mosque did...and i think hindus have the proof... that would be really silly if the hindus didnt get the area....
mohamed s
2010-09-29 08:38:27 UTC
Ayodhya problem is not big issue for Muslims because allaha (the lord) says people can worship any where in the earth.so there is no problem for us to pray.this verdict place is whom the place is. If the court gives favor to Muslims.TO AVOID PROBLEM WITH THE HINDUS BROTHERS , SISTERS AND AS RESPONSIBLE MUSLIM AND INDIAN CITIZEN.WE SHOULD GIVE THE LAND BACK TO THEM.

This is my own words for MUSLIMS
?
2010-10-01 21:43:27 UTC
We have received freedom as a result of sacrifice laid down by several great leaders. Our India was born as Socialistic Democracy without any Cast Creed or Religion. Now feel great pain when I see people fighting for small piece of land in the name of religion and God.



Mahatma Gandhiji wore only Dhoti when he attended the Round Table Conference in London even during Cold Winter, because he said, when other fellow Indians do not have enough to eat or wear anything to eat. he did not like to wear suits or winter clothings. Our present Politicians are prepared to rip fellow Indians of their cloths for their luxurious living.



Cant we have some neutral objective or goal towards improvement of standard of living and making our country rise up
rajendra s
2010-10-01 00:36:00 UTC
Judgement is judgement, decided by eminent jurists every one should accept it. No one should be fanatic. In any battle one is looser the other one is gainer. But in this case all are gainers, neither side loosing. I am stanch Hindu and of 70 years of age, but have never gone to Ayodhya to pray there, so is the case with so many muslim brothers, they may have never gone to Babri Masjid there. So hardly matter what comes up there, then why to show anger.
savithri_gopalan
2010-09-30 06:44:42 UTC
Respect the verdict. When we have other important issues to address, lessen hungar, human

suffering, this matter need not be allowed to continue. In my opinion, all 3 portions should be

used to build a nice hospital, where poor people belonging to all religion should get good and free

treatment . The name of the hospital can be RAM RAHIM.

savit
curious call
2010-09-30 06:09:52 UTC
I can't understand why our honourable judges don't compare the relative importance of a USUAL PLACE OF WORSHIP AND A BIRTH PLACE OF AN INCARNATION OF GOD. Babri Maszid was a place of worship like a usual temple or a maszid or a gurudwara like of which many are crumbling and are not used. But RAM JANAMBHOOMI has special sihnificance for Hindus as being the birth place of shree Ram. Muslim should surrender their right on that place as it is not as important for them as it is for Hindus While giving their verdict judiciary should have considered this thing . The given verdict has sown the seeds of riots
jayadevan
2010-09-27 23:33:36 UTC
Am not sure a temple will be built there or not, but am 100% sure that a mosque will never be built there even if the SC orders a mosque to be built there , emotions of kar sevaks are running higher than sky. Best solution is to build a temple there and build a mosque some were away from the site.
2010-09-25 00:31:02 UTC
As a responsible citizens we have to be satisfied with the decision whatever it will be. Religion,Caste,Community have existed for centuries.But our forefathers brought them all together for a greater cause-to get the country free .



I think a lot is wrong in my country.there are to many differences.BUT AS A RESPONSIBLE CITIZEN ,we have to be one with ourselves and stop playing blaming game.

MEDIAS should limit there ethics and don't take sides,argue or debate for Ayodhya dispute.
Rawney
2010-09-25 00:30:00 UTC
I am not quite sure if "reaction" and being "responsible" go together at all!We try to act in a situation, whatever the type of action is warranted by the situation. By action, we would like to look at it as our response, and our ability to respond sensibly is 'response-ability' or responsibility. In certain situations, inaction might be the most appropriate action, including an act of persuading others too to remain calm.



"Reaction" is what happens when people are simply carried away by "sentiments". Again, I am not sure if we have a correct translation for the word "sentiment" in Indian languages. As if the falsehood of emotion called as sentiment is not enough, we have also coined something called "false-sentiment"!



"Religious" sentiments would evoke "reactions" of unpredictable nature, which may cause loss of lives and property. The unprecedented security arrangements or "Bandobast" is out of apprehension of such "reactions". When emotions are totally out of control, it might take the shape of a reaction.



I would like to humbly respond by staying calm, and if possible, persuade yet others around to remain calm. That would perhaps be the best response, out of our ability to respond, if we happen to also maintain the awareness that we are responsible citizens.
prince47
2010-09-24 21:18:02 UTC
as the matter itself does not hold any legal sanctity, the verdict is invalid. its the matter of creating hue and cry among the political gambit in Indian politics.

religions predominately exit with the changing times. culture never fades away. hence cultural values to be taken into consideration for Ayodhya issue.
ronnie
2010-10-01 02:15:32 UTC
it was an responsible and respectable decision by the jury....we shouldn't look at it as a victory of one side and defeat of another side...court has done a tremendous job & we should be happy about it...and shouldn't get excited about it..!

i'm happy that people behaved in a responsible manner..!

for those who are not happy with the verdict ..they too have the reason not to create mess as both sides have decided to go to supreme court!

but as a responsible indian citizen..we should all abide the law and order...!

it was a really great job done by the three judges jury!

hats off to them and to the people of india as well! india should always be on the first place for us..!

india first!

jai hind!

jai youngistan!

be proud to be an indian! make your country proud! :)
nits
2010-09-28 05:53:01 UTC
As a resposible citizens, we should be aware of everything which is going to impact us, which is going to have a effect on our life. Being civilized does not only mean that we behave mannerly, but also, whether we think of preventing the civilization, i.e., society.



Before going to evaluate and henceforth react towards the said verdict which religion was actual owner of the land, we should study our religion, holy books and come to conclusion, that as per our religion which is more important: GOD or His Place of Worship? Which is more liked by God: Mercy or retaliation? love or hatred? Is it acceptable in our religion to show hatred? to retaliate ?



if we think of the above, then our reaction, whatever we take, will be justified as a responsible citizen
2010-09-26 12:48:15 UTC
There is no dispute and need of a verdict in this case. It is during the period of Nehru all problem started. The same way and same motive as killing Ghandi just to kill and drive Muslims out of the country. The incomplete task was continued by installing Ram idols by overnight, inside the mosque. The dispute started and the rest is history. No body understands the politics behind it.



The secular congress men did more damage to secularism than Hindu BJP and Shiv sena combined. Congress is full of N_Modis in disguise. They are getting the hob done through the opponants.
akta_me
2010-09-25 09:12:12 UTC
My personal opinion is ,though the laws of land have enough power to give verdict,( I have high respect for the law) but no government-whether it is left ,right,or other wise have guts and can politically afford to follow the verdict.



My solution is both the parties should abandoned the land in question as 'land of saitan',and live happily and together as real Indians.
?
2010-09-25 05:30:25 UTC
Hindus and Muslims have quarreled for years over the history of the Babri mosque in Ayodhya, a town in Uttar Pradesh. Hindus claim that the Babri mosque stands over a temple built in honour of Lord Rama. They say that the Babri Mosque was built by Babur’s general, Mir Baqi, on the orders of the Mughal leader Babur post destruction of the Ram Mandir in 1528.



Tension flared up in 1992 when supporters of VHP, Shiv Sena and BJP demolished the Babri mosque, stirring up nationwide riots between Hindus and Muslims which left more than 2,000 people dead.



Creation of a Sublime New World



The present day world is quite chaotic. To change it into an orderly, sublime new world, we have to begin with ourselves. Human being has at last arrived on the earth after long evolution. On birth he is quite blank in his mind but as he grows up, the conditioning of the human race is inherited by him as a part of his educational process which is but inevitable. But an inward journey taken by the human being is quite essential for him to understand happiness, sorrow, etc.



This inward journey alone liberates man from bondage. Liberation not in one but in all brings about a Sublime New World where there are no biases born out of differences in ethnicity, language and religion. Liberation releases man from temples, mosques and all such stupid creations of Man.
?
2010-09-23 18:59:39 UTC
The question is how we should REACT towards the verdict.

Why we have to react?

React as per Encarta dictionary is

Respond emotionally - to respond to something by showing the feelings or thoughts it arouses.

Respond by taking action - to respond to something by taking action

Be in opposition - to act in opposition to somebody or something

No body has to react.

There is a dispute in the ownership which has been taken to the arbitrator.

All parties emotionally attached to the issue should accept the verdict of the arbitrator.

Unattached parties should not be asked to comment making them also emotionally attached to it.

After all God is Omni present.

If it is the belief of every one God is in mandir, mosque, church etc.

Why shed one's tranquility in such issues.
?
2010-10-02 20:47:10 UTC
Are you having a disease free body, a soil (black soot of greedy and ****** karmas) free mind, a god loving soul and prayer loving family, a good earning job or business? If all these things are there in your soil(body), then you will not care about what is happening in Ayodhya, even if you are staying in there. If you are not having above qualities of character, you are a spoilt and wanderings of your mind have no end........what can we do, if you care such things which are in no way an iota of your life.
?
2010-09-30 07:07:21 UTC
Whatever the verdict it came, it's is all for our sake and peace so respect the religion, respect the people and most important respect the nation.

Every crime,riots,violence always impact the nation which make each one dump for their nation and which also effective for the economy's growth.



"Enjoy the freedom and liberty of nation and make yourself a good citizen of country along with Peace'.
?
2010-09-29 07:05:47 UTC
We should honour the verdict without any reaction. If any person/community/part is not satisfied with the judgment they can go for appeal in higher court but verdict should be respected at all cost.
amjad khan
2010-09-29 05:52:34 UTC
Hi,

Its really not as serious as it was in 1992. Now the mindset and thinking of today's generation has been changed. It was just a matter of politics when it started and now everyone is aware about this fact.



So I'll just say that Personally I am not going to think anything about this (no reaction at all).



Regards

Amjad Khan
Pramod S
2010-09-28 09:44:18 UTC
Who has interest in verdict??? few % of educated or powerful people.



I feel that if decisions of man made court test the humanity or cost few lives should not be encouraged. It would be better to delay such decision until we learn to behave properly with other people and respects each other values.



Waise bhee hindi main kahaawat hai, "Gade murde ukhadne se kisi ka bhalaa nahi hua hai".

Fir bhee Is desh ke bade- Budhe aur samjhdaar log jo soche achchha hee hoga.



As a responsible citizen and for sack of poor people (who are street wenders, casual labourers etc.) children of this country, I will not discuss on this issue in public and even in my home.



Bhagwan Sabko sadbuddhi deve Jai Bharat
Jumping Sun
2010-09-28 05:43:33 UTC
Like a civil society and responsible member of the country where there is a rule of law, every section should accept the verdict peacefully without resorting to violence.
2010-09-27 22:01:32 UTC
I think that this verdict would be postponed as it is a very sensitive issue and whatever it would be, we must respect the verdict and if someone disagrees with it then better go to supreme court instead of spread chaos and riots.
Priyash
2010-09-25 20:00:44 UTC
I think Ayodhya is a pure land. No religion in India is present who doesn't have something religious in it.

Fighting on just a single stretch of land doesn't seem to be great work. In my opinion the land should remain as it is without any changes. The purity of land should be maintained. No one of the 4 parties have real claim on it. It totally belongs to no one. it should be decided as world heritage and its owe right should lapse.
sepia
2010-09-24 04:11:51 UTC
As responsible citizens, we should restrain ourselves from reactions whatsoever and submit to the verdict of the Ayodhya dispute, undisputedly.
Angel
2010-09-30 15:56:24 UTC
I agree to Simmi ....... it should be made a place where people are not discriminated on terms of religion hence, built a hospital ......



Seems like the verdict is passed and I think it has been passed in favour of the Hindus by some sort of hidden force on judiciary probably due to abuse of power and authoirity and corruption
?
2010-09-30 00:47:10 UTC
Farting is problematic in Islam. During prayer, a worshipper must not fart. Sahih Bukhari (1.4.137) writes that Allah will not accept a Muslim’s prayer if he/she passes wind during the ritual. The exception occurs if the worshipper farts silently, or the fart does not smell. In such a case, he/she may continue with the prayer (ibid, 1.4.139).



A child resembles whichever parent climaxed first (Bukhari 55:546)

Satan causes yawning (Bukhari 73:245)

Spoons should be covered before going to bed (Bukhari 69:527)

Oversleeping is caused by Satan urinating in one’s ear (Bukhari 54:492)

The bathroom should be entered with the left foot first. (Fiqh - Islamic law)

Keeping a dog as a pet will cost the owner a celestial reward (Bukhari 67:389)

A man should spit only to his left (Muslim 7149)

The penis should be held with the left hand only when urinating (Muslim 512)

A person should wipe their butt with an odd number of stones after defecating (Bukhari 4:162)

Satan sleeps in ones nose, so water should be snorted each day (Bukhari 54:516)

No one should lie on their back with one foot crossing the other.

Bad dreams can be warded off by spitting over the left side of the bed (Bukhari 87:115)

The right shoe should be put on before the left (Muslim 514)

No one should enter the house through the back door (Qur'an 2:189)



However, Islamic bathing (ghusl) is compulsory under certain cases. These are:



Convert to Islam, must take a bath…(Sunaan Nasai, 1.190, 191)

Bury a polytheist, must take a bath…(Sunaan Nasai, 1.192)

After doing sexual intercourse, and if you ejaculate…(Sahih Muslim, 3.0670)



http://www.islamreview.com/articles/ALLAH_FROWNS.shtml



thank you!
?
2010-09-26 08:21:32 UTC
As Rahul Gandhi said that India has got greater and more important issues of development, education, etc.. More than reliogistic, lets be nationalistic. Whatever may be the Hon'ble Courts verdict lets accept with respect. India is already in limelight for its infamous preparedness for the CWG, lets not further tarnish the already dampened image. Any untoward incident may push India back by decades.
r
2010-09-24 22:39:44 UTC
Responsible citizens' Thats new. Would responsible citizens kill so many people claiming faith as motivation when its really hatred thats driving them. Be it the Hindus who burnt Muslim homes in UP or the Muslims who planted bombs. It was hate and irresponsibility. If we are responsible we will realize that any Temple or Mosque on this location can only be EVIL because it is built on the blood of innocents.
Bye pals
2010-09-24 05:09:36 UTC
my dear sir,



responsible people or indifferent people are not going to be a problem in the event of a verdict being released. Whatever the verdict, one side is likely to revolt while the other make so much noise of victory to the point of irritating others. The problem has been successfully made emotional by political and fundamental religious factions. Even the parties not keen about the sentiments of religion are making use of the situation for ulterior interests like election or unleashing violence (terror outfits waiting for a cause). So you can not wish away a situation that stares at us grimly!



may be you wish people not to aggravate situation by taking sides with the extremists. But it is going to be non issue. Because the trouble shooters are massive on either side. Look at the responses in this limited forum. Many people are virtually giving verdicts themselves as if they have no patience or confidence in judiciary! The Judiciary has limitations like considering points placed before them. They would be compelled to declare in favor of a side that had placed more plausible evidence, however subtley it may be claimed to be less true. As long as the truth is vague and external evidence lending to multiple interprets play the game, there is bound to be controversy.



If the govt was serious, they could have persuaded either parties to sit for an amicable solution, by itself playing a facilitatory role sincerely. But govts being manned by parties with their own interests to sustain power, division rather than harmony is favourable to them. We had seen the blatant appeasement techniques adopted by the rulers and it causes real concern to well intending citizens how the situation is likely to be handled by the govts.



I would say that ''responsible'' citizens would just pray most sincerely '' Iswar Allah thero naam; sabko sanmathi dho Bhagavan''!



God bless.
Afzal Shaikh
2010-09-23 13:56:01 UTC
What ever may be the verdict, its sure not to be a religious issue rather than a dirty political, becoz this issue is always highlighted near the forth elections. I would only say one thing to all Hindus and Muslims dont fight on this Issue. What so-ever is the result accept it whole heartedly. Honestly if we fight the third party is proud and happy of the foolish act of their great grand fathers. To make the point very clear, Yes my Indian brother's n sisters, the young British generation is very happy when they hear the news of Hindu muslim riots in India, and they might have a feeling that their great grand fathers have done such wonderful job that we are still fighting as Hindus and Muslims. Remember the Divide and Rule policy which you have studied in the history chapter during your school days. Now!!! Dont you feel that these politcians are playing the same game.
?
2010-10-03 13:10:32 UTC
Ayodhya is a place where Sri RAM rule before mughal came to india. When mughal emperor came to india and rule our country for a century.mughals are muslim, so they demolished hindu temple and built mosque in their places. During their time no one dare to go against the king, so temple are ruined and mosque came in their place. Some politician want to make issue/dispute against muslim minority to get status of their politicle empire. So such sensitive issue are brought in front of govt. and demands to solve such problem.

Such thing will cause ultimately to common people, so we shouldn't support politician mainly in rteligion matters. we are all brothers and sister. Forgiveness is divine so please forgive them , let them built temple and we can retain our culture that was exist 100 century ago. I am requesting to all citigen of india, let hindu built their temple because ayodhya is a pure place of sri ram. Andwe hindu should offer some place for the muslim to built their mosque. we are secular country, let help each other and live together....
pramod j
2010-10-02 20:13:49 UTC
1.First of all one should know the background.

2.Read the judgement as far as possible.

3.Compare it with the issue.

4.Be judicious and open mind as far as possible.

5.Discuss with knowledgeable people.

6.Express your views without trying to hurt anybody's sentiments.



This sequences can be changed. But remember a knowledgeable, reasonable and civilized debate never hurts anyone. This is the duty of a responsible citizen.
Ram D
2010-09-29 00:52:04 UTC
As a responsible citizen, I will remain calm; not spread rumors, dont be excited; and also do not get excited. Most important of all; do not indulge in any political talk, for a against anything. This should be the level of self restraint for all the citizens; more so for politicians.
remo
2010-09-26 16:30:01 UTC
I will cooly agree whatever the judgement whether it is in favour or not. Moreover, I urge all the citizens of india that this is not only place left for masjid or mandir. Please look at the people who are living in the disputed area. We are just sitting far from that area and deciding what is good, or what has to be done. Let us allow people to live happily and peacefully on this earth.
AD
2010-09-24 06:17:54 UTC
We need to understand that it is a piece of land.

God is everywhere. Whether verdict says Masjid or temple both are sacred place.

If we understand and accept it from core of heart then we would not find any point to fight.

We should keep our heart and mind open to accept the verdict.
?
2010-10-03 06:57:34 UTC
The verdict of the court should be honoured, and if needed we can look for guidance in future..The amicable verdict is super and a sign of Law of the land.
Anand
2010-09-28 21:43:59 UTC
Ayodhya is question of faith and not a dispute for land.

Muslims have to go
abhijit160984
2010-09-28 06:06:18 UTC
In my view,if people couldn't find a solutions in 60 years then it is not possible to get to a solutions in next few days.So court judgment should be considered as final judgment.If a party is not satisfied with the court judgment then in that case a party can approach the apex court.
kumarcl
2010-09-24 02:44:42 UTC
The best is, Not to react. Just ignore. The people of Ayodhya, Hindus and Muslims , live in harmony. It is the politicians who are mischief -makers.

We should ask the media, newspapers, news channels and all, to black out the news. No news is good news.
2010-09-24 02:36:23 UTC
We should maintain calm and peace across the country. whatever the decision may be we should obey the court decision over Ayodhya dispute.



-Jai Hind
?
2010-10-04 09:07:56 UTC
As responsible citizens, we should follow the rules and regulations of India and If we disagree with any of views of Government, Government has always given a space to citizens to raise their voice. So in the case of disagreement one can raise voice in that given space and format.
?
2010-10-03 06:01:30 UTC
Respect the cour verdict. Avoid spreding of rumours. Not discuss even within my exclusive community something unpalatable to other peoples' belief. If engaged in conversation, bring it to the logical conclusion that the judiciary is more informed than we people and it is free and independant without biases.
?
2010-10-03 05:02:09 UTC
As a responsible citizen, we must support the verdict and the side which is honest , right and fair.
Rohit G
2010-09-30 13:18:12 UTC
The best way we can react is by respecting the verdict of the court.On the same time we must promote religious harmony.
avinash v
2010-09-29 20:02:45 UTC
You should remain calm and quite. Pl. do not believe on roomers. Common man is not concerned with the result as he has to manage his family well. The news of verdict is blown out of proportion to take advantage of the situation by various parties and groups.
viraat
2010-09-29 16:06:31 UTC
RAM was born in AYODHYA. but MOHAMMAD was not even an INDIAN .SO BOTH CAN BE SEATTLE DOWN ANY WHERE IN AYODHYA. better govt acquire this land and make some thing that will be useful for the kids of RAM & MOHAMMAD.and make a temple of LORD RAM exactly in the middle of AYODHYA.and a mosque any good place in AYODHYA.that will be the good decision. make that place "no man land" and make good use of that place that will be good for AYODHYA and its residents. thanks.
2010-09-29 10:00:36 UTC
Being a responsible and mature citizens of india we must accept and respect the verdict of lucknow bench court. We must talk to our colleagues and friends about it positively and we should try our best not to allow any antisocial activity around us to happen.
Seetha Murugaswamy
2010-09-29 05:06:09 UTC
The only country which doesn't take any attack over other country from past onwards is INDIA.as the citizen of india we should go with our nation. first of all we should be unity . we are not doing it by work.whatever we may HINDU or MUSLIM we are all INDIANS.

if we consider the verdict we should maintain peace. As per my sugestion the verdict should be based on only catogory INDIAN not by any RELIGION.



JAI HIND
TKP57
2010-09-23 23:30:54 UTC
Lord Krishna In Gita has said "Swadharme indhanam shreyo per dharmo bhyavah" means it is better to die for own religion rather than following of some other religion. But the biggest mystery is hidden in this shlok. When he says "Swadharm " It means the religion pf spirit , and " Per dharm" are the religions of body. Personally I consider all these religions Hinduism, Islam, Christianity etc as religions of body and one will remain remain engulfed with sorrows and confusion and will never be able to know the true purpose of being on this imperfact planet with this imperfact existence called human being till he keeps on following either of them. those the followers of the religion of spirit which one and has no branch whatsoever will only be free from all miseries and grief. So all this issue of a piece of land has no relevance for the seekes of religion of soul.
Rajesh G
2010-09-23 22:02:35 UTC
Our reaction on verdict does not matter? The realty of it that can't be ignored is that the Congress-I will give instruction to courts to declare verdict after games to remove attention of people from corruption charges matter or at the similar situation when Congress-I will be in trouble.
?
2010-10-03 20:34:33 UTC
As the CONSTITUTION of our country clearly states INDIA is known for its the equality that is maintained between various religions ! As a movie dialogue goes INDIA is a country with 80% Hindus where the prime minister is a sikh and president is a muslim we are known for what we are ! we don't differentiate anyone based on religion ! We have the third largest army still we maintain peace ! the decision is another indication of equality ! the land has been shared ! In my opinion it is a good decision ! so let us accept it with peace !
Anirban B
2010-10-01 08:37:21 UTC
We should respect High Court verdict and pave way for the grand Ram temple.Moreover we should be searching for other mosques of similar history and make arrangement for returning it to the Hindus.
raj
2010-09-25 08:07:45 UTC
the only thing i think is " Is Ayodhya small"

No both hindus and muslims can live there. i wander all people are taking this so serious and making it so complicated. I am Hindu and i don't have any discrimination between Hindus and Muslims
k
2010-09-24 10:15:14 UTC
Being a Woman, I want to say, at least no violence should be inflicted on Women and Children in the name of "Emotional Reaction" to the SC decision. India was once a land, in historic times, when even in time of battles, women and children were still treated with respect and now they are the first ones to be attacked in the name of issues like this. Recall our basic fabric once again.
<<<<>>>>>>>
2010-09-24 03:08:46 UTC
as a resposible citizen like most other ppl (here) i can just express my views on yahoo answers , or watch news with expert views..,lolz,,

,,,we cant do much..and usually middle class indian citizens cant do much..its the poor or very rich who act,,



anywz i would like a ram temple there bcz thats what it was and if in india hindus dont have right of folowing thier religion where else..??in islamic countries they destroy idols and temples..



( if judge assigns place nearby temple for mosque no hindu will object)



and goin by numbers and population growth even if verdict is against hindus ,hindus arnt goin to riot..



the problem will be if its aginst muslims ( its goin to b great riot in that area)

( muslim population has multiplied manifolds in the ayodhya area)
Aparna M @ divya
2010-09-23 18:01:48 UTC
A citizen should be responsible for his acts. Every action of a citizen echo the nation. A nation will shine based on the actions of the citizens. The nation will proud because of the citizens responsible actions. Many great leaders sacrificed their life and property for the sake of their nation. so, we should act with more care and thus we can help the nation to shine well.
?
2010-09-25 07:05:17 UTC
The new generation of India, doesn't care about any caste, religion, etc. We do not care whatever the result is.

Any problem is not raised by citizens of India, but the only concern is the political parties. I think the opposition will set the states on fire whatever the result is.
?
2010-09-24 04:05:43 UTC
We the common man are law abiding citizen that is why we will respect the verdict .



But how political parties will react for it is big question.



They will be the real judge .huh
?
2010-10-01 12:36:41 UTC
As far as my ideas are concerned..people should improve their mental level through feeling as a secular person.Whatever the apex court decided, we should honestly follow the decisions.We should give priority to our country first then our religion and if we react through wrong ways then it's a question mark of our dignity,people.

So don't take part in any kind of unconstitutional activity and bring peace and harmony..
sastry m
2010-09-30 06:20:50 UTC
With faith in decisions of learned judiciary, sharing fruits of secular democracy and above all living under the shade of greatest human civilization that India established since many thousands of years we should act positively as responsible citizens with true spirit of understanding and cooperation and react negatively to self created prejudices of fanatical convictions in support of life in general.
2010-09-23 08:32:11 UTC
As a responsible and liturate citizen of India we should not make an issue of ayodhya dispute. Our politicians do not worry about what will happen in India for such verdict.

The answer of Mr.Muqtada Al sadr is not pertaining to the question. Why the sex is included in this answer? Does it have any relation with the question asked?

Forget and forgive if Hindu-Muslim want to remain peacefully in our beloved India. We are all one. Let us have this motto and spirit.

OK.
2010-10-01 05:39:32 UTC
Ayodhya is the main place of raman &also the vigraham of raman situated in their.so we cannot against with the hindhuism.I am not against with the judgement,the judge taken the decision is corret

Im a muslim,im not fully agree with the muslim.we want peace in society.
ranganath m
2010-09-29 01:20:17 UTC
whichever religion benifits from the verdict should avoid celebrating, and the losing party should congrajulate the opponent. and if they are not satisfied with the verdict should appeal against the judgement rather than venting anger and creating trouble.
?
2010-09-27 12:18:07 UTC
We all have our religious faith in heart n activities in temple/ masjid/church etc. All religions believe that GOD is omnipresent n not confined within 4 walls.We have enough unrest in public life n enough problems to solve in personal field. Lets be patient, take the verdict calmly--if, as and when it comes. GOD is not meant for kicking up a row. Lets use our good sense--keep an example, a constructive one, for the next generation. PLEASE!
duncans
2010-10-04 10:03:49 UTC
Respect court verdict and if not agreed go to the upper court.
Vidhat
2010-10-01 11:45:20 UTC
Its time to move on. There are more pressing issues than building a mosque or a temple. Its better we simply accept the court's decision. Appealing in the SC would not serve any purpose.
?
2010-09-29 14:26:02 UTC
Ayodhya dispute must be resolved .
Krishna Kumar K
2010-09-29 01:54:58 UTC
Leave the problem to the people of india. politicians, religions should not interefere. Our people know what do at the right time. it was proven number of times while defeating, smt indira gandhiji, Rajiv gandhi, BJP and so many so on.. we donot require caste, creed, religion. 90% of the population of India are selfless and broad minded. It is the politicians and Religion Heads spoil the harmony of our country.



All the best to perople of India.
ashok k
2010-09-27 05:43:16 UTC
When Muslim Ruller snatched thrown of Hindu Kings they also snatched property of hindu citizen of Hindustan now India. Similarly, they snatched Hindu Temple destroyed Hindu Temple and constructed masjid. This is wat actually happened. Now question is property of Hindu and Temple of Hindu snatched by Muslim Ruller can be returned to Hindus. What Law said in this case is the real argument. So, my opinion is if there were temple and later destroyed by Muslim Ruler than that land should be returned to Hindus to construct a Temple and the muslim community should gladly returned that peace of land to Hindus to construction Temple. Now this matter is in the Court of Law then we are bound to obey the Order of Supreme Cour or High Court, so we should accept the final verdit of Supreme Court who is the Legal Authority.
Manju
2010-09-27 01:28:51 UTC
I feel that we should not forget the crucial time when both religion stay united for fighting against the British.

we should remember that we both are the son of this soil.so whatever be the verdict we should prepare our mind so that we never think of violence.Definitely it will be the worship place.It may be Puja or may be namaz.The winning party should make the best provision for the defeater.
?
2010-10-03 09:42:29 UTC
I am not a supporter of gandhi but still my suggestion is WHATEVER IT IS GOOD OR BAD, DONT SEE, DONT LISTEN, AND MOST IMPORTANT DONT REACT. If u believe god then worship him anywhere with peace of mind. In Ayodhya there will not be peace of mind for anyone.
avnish
2010-10-04 04:49:29 UTC
as we know that honorable judges has given the decision on this matter.It is a balanced decision, we should accept this decision. religion came into existence to make harmony in society. all religion says same thing that is development of human personality. we should honour feeling of all human being. muslim should do karsewa to prepare temple, and hindus should do same thing in prepration of masjid, so that we should send a massage to orthodox of each community that we indian are true human being first, hindu& muslim later.

fortune marketing
Ankit Mathur
2010-09-30 09:42:42 UTC
We should accept the decision given by the court and prove that all religions in India are equal by showing peacefulness and accepting the things as they are plus co-operating with other religions and making India to gallop towards her development.
2010-09-29 07:30:26 UTC
211 answers for this meaningless issue? What a pathetic world we are living in!

This issue merits no consideration whatsoever. The Government should summarily take over the place and build a Hospital or College over there for genuine benefit of everyone.
Vinod
2010-09-27 17:04:28 UTC
As a normal citizen you need not to do any thing as the scene is always creatyed by some peculiar fellows normal citizen has nothing to do. It is always done by some special citizens.

However Ram might have his birth place somewhere why not to search in afganistan
Sameer
2010-09-24 10:45:58 UTC
As a responsible citizen we should and must obey the law. If you are not satisfied with the decision then you must approach supreme court. For sure, If the decisions goes in favour of Babri Masjid, definitely Hindus will approach supreme court and vise-versa.

We must realize who is behind this ? Who is going to be benifited with this ?
2010-10-03 04:25:40 UTC
As responsible citizen I, should be neutral on this dispute. On this dispute I fully respect Court decision. Mosque have four Minar(pillar), without a minar it is not consider as mosque.
Revathy
2010-09-27 06:50:00 UTC
Best thing is to :



Not to spread any rumor



Report to police any rowdyism, vandalism in the name of religion.

Not to discuss anything about the verdict in public places.

Keep calm.
AB
2010-10-01 21:22:35 UTC
Now that the verdict is out, there is nothing to react, except accepting.
maddy
2010-09-30 19:35:25 UTC
We have to first behave in a sense which represents our integrity and then accept the verdict which any further refusal or with out any more further petitioning.
param
2010-09-29 22:38:47 UTC
I respect whatever decision of honrable highcourt but I personally think that, an Orphanage would be a good alternative instead of Ram Mandir or Babri Masjid!!
Sumanraj K
2010-09-26 15:39:51 UTC
It amuses me to watch the posturing of the political parties on talk shows. Disgusting. Their chicanery is transparent. The Sangh Parivar is once again whipping what is now a dead horse. India gives a damn (me included) which side the judgment goes. Time to move on.
?
2010-09-25 14:37:09 UTC
It is very sensitive judgement announced by Supreme Court court may be announced the judgement very clearly but government take necessary actions to avoid the quarrelling between muslims and hindus
anu
2010-09-25 00:04:46 UTC
we should not react negatively. if we believe God then we must follow his rules. God says for me everybody is same. then we also have to do the same. So plz concentrate on other problems. coz if any type of problem will happened in Ayodhya it definitely help "Atirekis" to attack on our country. and it results in biggest problem for our country. We have also problem of monsoon in Delhi. So we have to think about all problems of our country.
nithy
2010-09-23 03:15:46 UTC
We need to maintain calm over the verdict as firstly the Allahabad High is not the final say in land ownership suite. Secondly, even the supreme court will pass judgment based on the laws and constitution. Was there a temple on the spot? If so, should there be a temple again on the same place. What of the Mosque which stood there for all this time? There are no simple answers to these questions. In the end, calm, mutual understanding of issues and discussion amongst the various parties alone can finally bring an end to the dispute.
?
2010-10-01 21:05:45 UTC
very intellectual judgement, but it should be before babri masjid destruction because lots of unexpected situation already happened due to Ayodhya dispute.
Ameet
2010-09-29 06:38:05 UTC
As a reponsible citizen of India; we should repect the Court`s order and behave as per the order of the court. The court will judge on available proofs.
kolarik
2016-11-16 06:10:36 UTC
notice:- The under respond i typed after observing the reactions of countless Sunni Muslim leaders of India on television., for 4 hours. If the Muslims there, have been calling it Masjid E Janam Asthan , then its glaring that there would have been some Hindu Temple there as a results of fact Hindus build one on each and each sacred spot . needless to say , that temple has been demolished and a Mosque grew to become into built . in a while while the interior of sight Muslims have been given compassionate , they allowed the approach via which Hindus controlled to get a corner place to geared up a small corner shrine. Justice according to info would be delivering the great section to Hindus. yet as a results of fact it may harm the Muslims (although quite they dont would desire to as a results of fact the Mosque grew to become into geared up interior the prevalent demolish and build way because it grew to become into accomplished in hundreds of places in India) and could lead directly to pointless violence , the Judges did clever artwork. BJP - Sangh Pariwar's basically concern is political income . Their demolition act of Babri Mosque is a great mistake and a sin devoted on humanity . tens of millions of lives lost and woman and little ones have been given raped and killed in Asia as a results of their barbarian act. They did the comparable ingredient as a results of fact the invading Muslim armies did that ingredient to demolition of Hindu Temple yet its basically yet another barbarian act. Secularists comprehend the reality yet they're clever adequate not talk to sidestep Muslim sentiments getting harm as a results of fact they'd initiate the violence in rage (not basically like the Sangh Pariwar who initiate it planned and controlled). Muslims on the different hand wont settle for the blunders devoted via the Muslim Ruler ie demolition of the Hindu Temples and development Mosques in that place. .Thats the foolishness on their area . Revenge is the foolishness on Hindu's area. Secularists who dont talk the reality are cowards. Thats my opinion. I dont decide on any Temple or Mosque there as a results of fact some terrorist (Hindu or Muslim) someplace would have been already making plans to blow it off and public funds ought to be spent for its protection. give up giving dogmatic secular and hate and revenge speeches and initiate off speaking truths.
rakshashi
2010-09-28 23:54:25 UTC
All the political leaders are suppose to be quite without giving any commends atleast for a couple of days. Automatically the country will be peace.
Antrus
2010-09-28 22:16:01 UTC
we all are indians and we should especially during this time place our identity as indian and our relegion to be that of brotherhood and patriotism above evrything else because if we started seeing ourselves as individuals during this period or placed or relegion above everythig it will be a huge setback for the county which is the best exanmple of peaceful living together in this worl.besides the fact we shoul not bother whether there was a mandir or mazjid there because ram sita ji chale gaye aur unka yug bhi chala gaya and allah is always said to be with us in the form of quran therefore we should place them in our hart and not fight over whwther ram was born there or not.
2010-10-01 12:35:09 UTC
True fact is that we are neither muslim nor hindu, we are just human being ,came in existence to maintain the continuity of life. SO THERE'S NO REASON TO FIGHT/DISPUTE,DOESN'T MATTER WHAT VERDICT SAYS.
Pad
2010-09-27 17:15:13 UTC
Nothing; stay calm,do not indulge in anything which will affect peace.World is not going to end because of the verdict.
?
2010-09-25 07:41:10 UTC
we should respect the verdict of the high court and remember that such communal disputes should not harm and undermine the unity of the country!!! we are INDIANS first, then hindus or muslims.
Shekhar
2010-09-23 04:41:13 UTC
Neither the Ayodhya isuue- the political one or the title deed which is decided on 24th comes to an end .. the title deed will be refought in SC; even the home minister says so.. the political issue will be raked up whatever may be the verdict

Lets NEGLECT the verdict.. at least political parties will think that it doesn't concern us anymore
?
2010-10-02 09:00:50 UTC
I think we should not disrespect any religions.Every body has its own believe & faith.........

On the contrary regarding this verdict,we should not discriminate among ourself for any religion or caste.

Rather we should follow the religion of HUMANITY & fight for the existence of our Mother EARTH which is getting worsen day by day
Transformer
2010-09-24 10:21:14 UTC
Who care responsibilites.

Who is responsble.

It depends upon complete indian judges.

My country India is running automatecilly due to a to z potency of the country.

for examples : Companies like Tata,Reliance and other indian bussinessmen.

Their is no role of any government.
?
2010-09-23 10:22:40 UTC
the decission of supreme court is not justify because the proof are already available in this ayodhya land the pillers of the temple are already situated and so this is proof the sita maa rasoi is already situated in old babri masjid than my conclusion shri Ram janambhumi is Ayodhya
?
2010-10-05 01:48:53 UTC
The judgement given is Very good.

All the people in India should have the same IDEA .

INDIA is for Indian and not for religion.

One INDIA one humanity. That is WE CALLED INDIAN .

RAM / RA HIM / ROBERT.



Ramadasse

Pondichéry

INDE
geyamala
2010-09-30 22:21:02 UTC
all the people who have faith in the justice system should abide by the verdict given by the court.
2010-09-29 22:57:39 UTC
As responsible citizens i thoght that we never dispute in ayodhya kand. and i try again and serve the people becuse hindu & muslim best relgious and best people in own country . we thinking to make the country never from one and two person. becuse country make the relesionship from hindu & muslim so we try peacefull india beutiful india make the long long time. thanks from my advice.
Mahesh
2010-09-29 09:34:53 UTC
I have nothing to react to this verdict as it is like any other case to me. First of all, who am I? in other words, who we are? A hindu? or Muslim? or Christian? who else? If my mother said that I am a hindu, then I am so...... i am a Muslim then i am so...... Then y the f_ _ k we fight for religion? think
Amita
2010-09-24 00:14:03 UTC
Rather than wasting our time waiting for the verdict its better that we utilise is for more important works. The CWG games need more priority right now..
akki.vaibhav
2010-10-01 01:57:14 UTC
being a civilised citizen of country we should keep a strong faith in our constitution and should obey the verdict , laws, rules, since indian tribunal is an independent and impartial body,its decisions should be welcome as one for all verdict.



people should not take up any agitating comments and remain calm.
?
2010-09-30 01:52:39 UTC
my name is shamsher ali and i m mechanical engineer. we must behave with every one in our talk even at home with our parent and to every one normally.i m realising that muslims are more sensible for this in compare to hindu.i trust that our court will give a best decision. more than indian other country is eager to know about our court judgment, because all the panel is hindu. so it must be like that every body appriciate the judgment. and govement should take strict action against those people who are interest to collapse at watever decision
2010-09-28 02:47:28 UTC
accepting verdict is our duty.

but i wish the site must be for the benefit of all religions and humans being not for a particular community.
Dipnarayan G
2010-09-26 11:36:04 UTC
Everybody knows everything. Still it is a matter of concern for all. Most people are fighting for false reasons. Sometime political fight is better than riot between two religions. Lack of proper education is behind everything.
?
2010-09-24 01:37:17 UTC
I think as a responsible citizen, we should respect verdict whatever it is whether in favor of hindu or muslim.



I dont know why all this issue is. Why cant we make both masjid and mandir at same place because all religions belong to god and he is same for everyone



Thanks,

Ankit

http://everythingprecise.blogspot.com/
?
2010-09-24 01:05:46 UTC
dont know why people are making it so big...we must believe & respect the court's decision..afterall they are not country's enemy...people should look after matters which are pending from years with the same enthusiasm & should raise their voice for the same so that justice to those matters..a good citizen will in court's proceeding unless everything is crystal clear
Crazy Biceps
2010-09-23 06:55:01 UTC
We should accept the court verdict gracefully whatever it may be. There is always an option of appeal for people who think justice has not been done.
?
2010-09-28 08:40:30 UTC
Since I do not believe in any kind of personified God Head. For me the God is the omnipresent light of Universal wisdom, which is within my heart as well as everywhere & that God is Universally existing within all living as well as nonliving beings. For me to remember, to meditate, that Universal God with gratitude, I do not need any special place of worship like Church, Temple, or Mosque etc. What others do is their own self-created everyday life, situations & events. They are as free as I am to act as they please. This is a free world after all...



That significant wonderful moment when you realize indeed "YOU" are nothing else but the undivided part of the Universal-Nature & accept your birth, living & death as unavoidable everyday normal events of that ever self-recreating Universal Divine Nature all your individual self-importance evaporate as if it has never existed before resulting into freedom of your born free consciousness... Then whatever happens around "YOU" you shall accept it as a blessing with endless gratitude...
kk
2010-10-01 01:35:53 UTC
see as a indian we understands the complecations of this case. hindu and muslims people gets influenced by others (politicians and religious group), common people knows one thing and that thing is dat how to take care of their family and its financial status.

lets not get into dis too deep coz doing so will lose our goodness and start blaming other religious group, dis is all created by politics, common man was not aware of this case for several years. both of us (hindus and muslims) stayed together for hundreds of years in peace.
שŶ......♫♫♫♫♫♫
2010-09-29 04:47:41 UTC
We should give due respect to the verdict.If there involves any disagreement,one can go to Supreme Court.Violence can find no solution.I hope everything is for good.
Røģεɾṡ
2010-09-27 22:40:06 UTC
Accept the judgment as it is. If it isn't acceptable, then there is an appellate court ahead. Its no use rioting or coming to streets to protest. What it shows will only undermine the unity of our nation.
J A
2010-09-26 04:55:04 UTC
Well its me here ...I was searching for something else and came across this question.

I am in Canada I was looking to chat with my buddy in India and came across this question by accident please - don't take my words in a bad way just saying ...or should I say suggesting.



I think you all -each and everyone of you should think logical and think of what this world is about.



Is it not about being united?



Is it not about praying together and staying together regardless of who what and where you are in life or looks even?



I think you all need to think in the logical sense and stop the nasty times work together and do not be phoney about who you are.



What is the dispute about - religion - is that what your god would like happening or is it not better to agree to disagree set things aside and blend your idea's work together for a greener happier life and time's while you are still able to walk and talk and lift yourself to view the people around you to go forward in life out of respect of your god - its not about fighting amongst groups of one another and realize - not anyone does get away with wronging the the next person - in any position or capacity.



You all need to get a grip and I hope you learn the idea of agree to disagree but stay in the thinking of not fighting not harming anyone not pushing your idea's on anyone for the wrong reasons.



I hope you all are doing better, I think of you every time I hear of a nasty event there or weather conditions causing harm there and I can't help but wonder ......and worry for the people I do know of there ....please agree to disagree and think about what it comes down to ...that is you believing in your own god and doing good not creating hard times for selfish reasoning.



I hope I havent hurt anyone's feelings here..sorry if I did. I just think its best people get along with the nasty effects of the earth's warming and fear and worry of that. Come on guys and girls women and real men of integrity ...if you are real about you and your god - do what is real and good for your god and fighting and causing tough times to other;s is not what your god or anyone's god would have accepted or wanted.

Good luck

Keeping my fingers crossed for you all to work it out and set an example for others near and far :)
younmanofthegarden
2010-09-24 07:00:01 UTC
respect the judgment -but the government must use its force to Control the situation.

no one has right to disturb the life of the other people- why other people to meet the expense

of the police force- hindu religious leaders and muslim religious must pay all expenditure.the government must close all the religious place - and declare it as a common community place
Mushtaq Ahmad
2010-09-23 08:41:12 UTC
If we have sympathy of our country and if we are patriotic, then we shall be obedient to the verdict which may come out from the Honorable Court and losers shall share happiness with the winner. Further more, we all people whether Hindu, Muslim, Sikh or Christian, we belong to one Super Power who controls us, therefore, we must respect each other and eliminate devils coming in between. Whether it is Temple or Mosque, in both the places we worship God, then why to pave way for riots etc.
Thoufiq T
2010-09-28 05:50:02 UTC
Better we stay calm..



Accept the VERDICT ..

All are fate..

Somebody say's its the place for RAM's

And somebody say's it's for ours - MUSLIM's



No one known there is which is present that b4 the Babari Masjidth..



- Pray for Silence
2010-09-25 07:25:39 UTC
The supreme court's verdict is indisputable. we should respect it's decision and inderstand the with reason rather than emotions.
Ashok
2010-09-28 07:33:32 UTC
Friends, These are only political games.Political influence always super seeds court decisions and sufferer is common man . So we should be firm to keep silent and not to be forced for any violence. Don't go behind political or spiritual leaders.Great INDIA is our country and let us maintain Peace.

God bless all !
sudhir k
2010-09-28 03:58:45 UTC
Responsible citizens in india what a joke it is badluck of india that we are not responsible citizens .We want everything from country but not want to give any thing to our country
2010-09-28 02:57:54 UTC
by accepting the courrt's verdict and appeal and try to maintain calm and peace wht else.....u cant do much except for making people understand tht just a piece of land doesnt deter our religious beliefs nd make people understand tht when we come to earth theres no religion attached to us its only our name tht makes us hindu or muslims.....



may peace prevail upon INDIA
2010-09-24 22:40:03 UTC
most ppl in ayodhya dont hv internet connection,,so they cant answer here.

i wont b goin to ayodhya to react
2010-09-24 06:45:26 UTC
Respect the verdict to avoid communal violence
Gayathri V
2010-09-24 03:50:36 UTC
actually our government is not responsible,why is this issue so much in hype when we take oath that all are brothers and sister then why talking of religions just built a wall between the temple and mosque let everything be in its place thats is,we should only ask for this rather than any stupid judgment.
?
2010-09-30 04:02:27 UTC
The Defination of God-

THE CREATOR OF UNIVERSE- BRHMA.

HE IS NOT A FATHER OR SON OF ANY ONE.

HE DOESNT NEED SLEEP - SO DOESNT NEED PLACE TO REST..

MOST KNOWLEDGEBLE - KNOWS THE NO OF FISHES IN THE SEA AND THE LEAFS OF TREES, KNOWS ALL THE THING BETWEEN SEVEN SKYS.

THE FINAL JUDGE. MOST KIND. HE CAN GET THE THINGS DONE JUST BY SAYING "BE" AND IT IS DONE. HE DID SEND MANY MESSENGERS TO THE MANKIND TO CORRECT WRONG DOING-PRAYERS ETC. AND ALL THE GOOD ATTRIBUTIONS DO GO TO HIM ONLY.. HE HAS NO IMAGE.. HE IS MOST PURE..

WE ALL ARE CHILDREN OF ONE MAN AND A WOMAN I.E. ADAM AND EVE.. WE ALL HAVE TO REPLY TO HIM AND HIM ONLY..
?
2010-09-29 00:09:03 UTC
Be calm,respecr verdict of court.
Jobseeker
2010-09-27 09:17:12 UTC
No doubt this verdict will be in favor of hidus and the Muslim must pay off.
samsung
2010-09-25 02:58:47 UTC
In this place if govt himself construct a shopping complex & cinema theater instead of mosque or temple all community people are come & go
vighnesvaran
2010-10-01 09:32:37 UTC
You should respect the decision. That is how the people at that time showed respect to the stupid king when the temple was broken down.
?
2010-09-24 01:04:07 UTC
there must be a geneiune headforth for this decision. i want that there must be RAM MANDIR 4 sure as it is ayodhya and the muslims must get the right for a mosque at their pilgrim.
jas
2010-09-30 00:01:03 UTC
"Accept the Pain" and "Accept the Verdict" whatever it is. Put a full stop to these commotions. LET US BRING PEACE.
sanjay
2010-09-26 09:44:51 UTC
to solve the ayodhya problem there are two Option one to make hospital and other to make collage. just fighting for temple or mosque its better to fight for kashmir
nilu
2010-10-01 00:11:39 UTC
INSTEAD OF DIVIDING THE LAND IN 3 PARTS,THEY COULD HAVE BUILT A AUSPICIOUS STRUCTURE WHICH WOULD B USEFUL TO ALL THE PEOPLE OF DIFFERENT RELIGION.AND WHAT COULD B THAT PLACE?IN MY OPINION THE PLACEWOULD B the hospital.IT GIVE LIFE TO EVERYONE.



WHAT U THINK OF MY IDEA?PLS LET ME KNOW.MY ADD-ashfahafr@yahoo.com.
Raj
2010-09-28 23:38:02 UTC
in real it is ram mandir

hindus stayed in india approx 10000 years

approx 700 year before muslims came india

so all religious places are hindus

ram born in apx before 3000 year in ayodhaya

so clear

pl favour hindus because jay shree ram
MS - Believe in Ek Oankaar
2010-09-23 17:50:25 UTC
The definition of responsible citizens differs but that is a different story. But lets talk as a responsible common man, we should respect the verdict of the court, and accept it. We should make sure that we do not get carried away by any emotions, if the decision does not come in favor of us. We should make sure that we do not encourage any rumors, we should make sure that we do enough to discourage and suppress any rumors as and when possible. In any unfortunate event of violence whatever help we can provide to our society in-spite of religion we must do that.
the eco warrior
2010-10-02 02:17:09 UTC
the politicians cause the communal riots. the people should be sane enough to understand this and rise above the caste and creed politics. unless we have caste based reservations in schools, colleges and govt jobs, we are gonna have politicians to raise up irrelevant issues and make people fight between themselves
?
2010-10-02 06:18:54 UTC
accept verdict and rest the case
2010-10-01 07:14:50 UTC
Accept with due respects towards Judiciary.
?
2010-09-28 01:06:00 UTC
The problem will not solve as long as the muslim are not accept with honestly that the Ayodgaya is related to RAM.
Anurag
2010-09-26 21:56:40 UTC
Let Bygone be Bygone.



Forgive & Forget.



Let's start afresh for our countries well being.



We have several other challenges to look after which are of utmost importance. Let us all live together & live in harmony.



Live & let live...
?
2010-09-24 07:15:25 UTC
i would want Ayodhya a place of peace.......... a place where we should remember about humanity not terror...........so i would want ayodhya to be a communal harmony place as APJ Abdul Kalam had said...............................hats off to Ayodhya.let us work together for the welfare of society . the main thing we should do now...is make the public aware about the issue.and avoid political interuption
deepak57
2010-09-23 22:38:39 UTC
A responsible citizen has to pay donation for making temple and mosque & more responsible has to collect the same.
biren2516
2010-09-27 07:36:52 UTC
oh cmon these all are politically raised issue I hope not so many people knew It before BJP raised this issue but what ever it is we should respect court decision if it not politically motivated and our great clerics shall not try to give it communal colour
?
2010-09-24 04:39:07 UTC
Firstly I would like to answer "why do you want to look at this" (the user id)

Mr.! u r quoting quran out of context from the start to the end, for example if I say that “veerappan was a hero for his people” n people like u take just “veerapan was a hero” it means u r quoting out of context, if u want to know the truth of any thing not only this see from the start to the end, u may heard that empty vessel makes much noise it suits u, if u want to fill ur vessel with wise and truth I can help u, go for www.islamtomorrow.com and www.peacetv.tv If u r true to ur religion search truthfully u may get it, and one more thing if u know English then u can get a copy of quran with English translation from www.islamtomorrow.com and atlast allah knows the best.
rajini
2010-09-30 04:23:36 UTC
As a Indian citizen we must and should obey the justice.
nana
2010-09-30 22:36:23 UTC
Work is worship, contiunue doing your work. Keep working in harmony with one and all, and maintain the atmosphere of goodwill. Law will take its own course, lets leave it aside!!
?
2010-09-29 07:42:58 UTC
There is a solution for every problem.

What is damaging is the trouble shooters go- scot-free.
Moti
2010-09-27 06:22:20 UTC
If we were responsible, the dispute would never have come up.
Anuj
2010-09-23 04:23:35 UTC
in actually people have no deciding power...if had than this issue was solve b4 long time...importance is how India's political parties and their back hand organization (proclaim extremists from both side) react?

also court should understood current situation in Indian societies...they can't be remove there responsibilities..!!@
2010-09-23 03:36:06 UTC
Only by not following -



1/ The Politicians; &

2/ Not believing the Breaking NEWS by some chitchat Reporters.
Big boss
2010-10-04 02:37:07 UTC
we respect this verdict, but some opposition leader are worrying about their vote bank only. kuch "amichand aaur jaichand "peda hogaye he. jo vote ke liye desh ko bhi bech sakte he. be careful. inhi logo se azadi ko khatra he.
?
2010-09-25 07:07:39 UTC
We should be neutral and respect the verdict.
sreenivasa m
2010-09-28 01:13:24 UTC
WHATEVER BE THE VERDICT AS A RESPONSIBLE CITIZEN i WOULD RESPECT THE VERDICT.
Muthu
2010-09-27 23:56:49 UTC
I EARNESTLY HOPE THAT THE VERDICT ON THE SENSITIVE ISSUE WILL BE A "WIN -WIN" POSITION FOR BOTH THE FACTION. OBVIOUSLY THERE IS NO ROOM FOR CHAOS OR CONFUSION. WIN INDIA ITS UNITY IN DIVERSITY SECULARISM WILL PREVAIL VANDHE MATHARAM,
?
2010-09-27 22:56:22 UTC
Ask this question only to muslim community they behave in bad manner because they wanna create second pakistan in india.
Aravind Narayanan
2010-09-25 23:18:55 UTC
we shud remain calm!...coz worrying dont make problems lighter! so wats the need of worrying if that worry cant solve ur problem!...i think....instead of any religious centre dere...we shud construct anything which ud be beneficial for all humanity...something like a superspeciality hospital.....
Vikram
2010-09-25 08:30:48 UTC
Stay neutral. It is a political issue and not a common man issue
Spiritualseeker
2010-09-23 03:20:08 UTC
I am not quite sure if "reaction" and being "responsible" go together at all!

We try to act in a situation, whatever the type of action is warranted by the situation. By action, we would like to look at it as our response, and our ability to respond sensibly is 'response-ability' or responsibility. In certain situations, inaction might be the most appropriate action, including an act of persuading others too to remain calm.

"Reaction" is what happens when people are simply carried away by "sentiments". Again, I am not sure if we have a correct translation for the word "sentiment" in Indian languages. As if the falsehood of emotion called as sentiment is not enough, we have also coined something called "false-sentiment"!

"Religious" sentiments would evoke "reactions" of unpredictable nature, which may cause loss of lives and property. The unprecedented security arrangements or "Bandobast" is out of apprehension of such "reactions". When emotions are totally out of control, it might take the shape of a reaction.

I would like to humbly respond by staying calm, and if possible, persuade yet others around to remain calm. That would perhaps be the best response, out of our ability to respond, if we happen to also maintain the awareness that we are responsible citizens.
success
2010-09-29 08:01:18 UTC
whatever be the verdict people must be ready to accept it
Harish mahipat
2010-09-28 08:04:48 UTC
as responsible each indian

donate that land to make world best hospital for poor for free treatment

it will be use every indian without asking thier cast/ religion
?
2010-09-24 05:27:25 UTC
we have to be honest regarding true facts and we should not belief over rumors as whatever the judgement will be delevered by Court it will be based on facts and as per law and we have to accept it as low of land as ultimately there is rule of law and not of ....? .Even if we act like blind it will be unfortunate to India and even to world to sme extend.
?
2010-10-03 07:00:55 UTC
i think people of india are showing great maturity by staying calm and maintaining peace. the politician must stay calm now and don't give aggressive statements
Anonymous
2010-09-29 07:11:33 UTC
RELIGION'S GONNA GET US KILLED SOMEDAY...It's true 'cause we are all proud of our own religion and we all know that different religion have their own history,and at some point the history between religions clashes but then again,we are all stuck in our perfect religion.
Mashuque
2010-09-25 10:41:54 UTC
We should honour court whatever might be its verdict.
NQS
2010-09-24 09:33:08 UTC
Accept the court verdict.

Have faith in the law of the land

don't give way for lawlessness

PEACE WILL PREVAIL AMONG ALL COMMUNITIES FOR PEACEFUL CO-EXISTENCE
2010-10-01 19:50:47 UTC
We have built enough of mosques and temples....its time to build a better nation
sirkaliswamy
2010-09-29 21:13:06 UTC
be calm, the judgement takes 10 years to judge so accept the judjement... Do you work it will only give u credit!
syed s
2010-09-24 02:22:52 UTC
RNPKB: where you have read that Baber was a terrorists go and correct your history. He was kind, loyal and he even adopted a rajput girl and always treated her a her own daughter and even after his death Humyun treated her as his daughter. Don't talk about the things about which you dont have knowledge.



You said "There was Mandir , there was setu, there was Dwarika and so on. There is limit for tolerance also". Do you have any written proof? No...... actually these days Muslims are tolerating the Babri masjid issue, Hindus not only damaged the just a Masjid but they also damaged the historic place.
?
2010-09-23 23:35:17 UTC
We have to respect the verdict.
666
2010-09-23 03:26:08 UTC
AS responsible citizens what did we do when the Babri was brought down? Stayed calm! As responsible citizens what did USA do when 9/11 took place?Action! against whom? Now thats where USA erred. The info that they recd and the intteligence gave were very conveniently sidestepped and for Political milage at the home front what happend is for all of us to see, once again as responsible citizens... that the Political Giants can never be wrong so to right the wrong they are still playing in our backyard with Mehboob Saha Qureshi in the forefront!!!

The Shahs love to arrogannt and USA also love the game of subtlity and what next... a red face for .. the Shah. Be careful Mr Shah do not buy this so easily... because USA is trying its level best to pass on the Batton well... the Batton of nArrogancy.. but this time it is to you and to your own world. What next... USA will resign and start prceedings against all her citizens... which might hurt you real bad.

What mnust Indians do.. is it in the interest of Shah to get equal with his friends *** foes? If so again it will be a red face. I say listen to Mr Imran Khan when we go out to the world the penninsula is together... which means if India wins its should be an honour for Pak too!

Mr Shah... its you on target and not India.... or even Hindus...

USA have your soft spots identified well including women... with strong grits like....me.....so be very careful.

The Kar Sevaks and/or the civil authorities are paid well to see that it gets demolished.. lets face it.

These are Govt backed Qaidas... so lets not fight it... Its the right time in India too just before election!!! to create mayhem and fear in the minds of those who want Socialism.... for the people.

So which Govt is against the people?

The present, and which opposition is against the people the present. Now that we can see things clearly... do u really really wanto put in your efforts whether it be friendly or even against? I say there were no friend neither foes.

We are all equals! If your concern is whether it might spread to u'r cirridor, the ans is Yes... who will carry it.... the Media... which media... BBC.

I say y don't you adopt this socialism in practice and free some of the political prisoners?

Its only a suggestion... and I say some... the ones whom you consider as a liabilty only those.

That would be an excellent move... on your part and the Kingdom that you represent. I admired when kings play Chess but when the Hindu kings started doing it even at the cost of keeping their DEAR wives at Stakes.. I say... get the Hell out of this mess... they do not even value their women here,, lest to say their kingdom.

In this present world the way I see it... you will surely get the cake and eat it as well!!!!

Its a matter of time and UK and USA knows this fact and that is why they are here to spoil that with you... and I suggest.. would u really wanto share anything with anyone when it comes to POWER sharing?

Decide well... take time.. there is a whole lot of Islamic and Arabic world that is looking upto you... even the Khamenis!!!! in Iran.
?
2010-09-27 11:57:30 UTC
Just accept the decision happily. How does it matters whether it is a mosque or a temple. God is God whether its allah or ram.
2010-09-27 02:51:12 UTC
Everybody knows what is the right answer…



Here I appreciate you…

great question ,, hats off to u..
Kreiz
2010-09-23 19:18:45 UTC
I dont know whether you people believe in god or not. But

Ram born in Ayodhya. Babar Not,

If you are a Indian, Give preference to the one who born here.(Indian first)

Babar looted Ram place. Give back his place.

Ayodhya belongs to Ram and not Babar.
2010-10-03 01:17:33 UTC
Pro - Muslims .
2010-09-27 06:49:33 UTC
god is one and lives in our hearts not in buildings made from men so blast the building and make some hospital, school or old peoples home there.
?
2010-10-01 03:50:58 UTC
FOR THIS ,IN MY OPINION , HINDUS AND MUSLIS SHOULD BE GIVEN EQUAL PART OF LANT SO THAT THERE WILL NO DISPUTE AMONG THEM AND BY THIS WE CAN AAPLY THE LAW OF RITHGT TO EQUALITY , WHICH WILL BE GVEN TO THE BOTH THE CASTES.....
?
2010-09-28 21:40:39 UTC
this issue only responsible for govt of india
2010-09-27 05:44:43 UTC
KIsiko thappar marne V mat do or kisiko thappar V mat maro..

only make our country best..
?
2010-09-26 08:23:27 UTC
as responsible citizen i think v should create awareness in people, wat was happned at d time of BABAR dat was past wat he did dat was wrong bt nw creating voilence is nt a solution of problem..nw wid d help of media we must sort out dis prob wid non-voilence.at past wat happned was worst bt nw thinking about every1s future we must condentrate about our present.

wat is my opinion dat nw i dnt think der is problem of babari masjid....we r gonna harm our heritage vastu.nobody is going to get benifit from dat ok so i think d temple n masjid at 1 city its good for everyone after all GOD IS ONE..............

so ayodhya is not hindus or muslims it is our COUNTRIES n people of my country called INDIA
s.d
2010-09-24 23:10:43 UTC
jst be quiet....................

I think that govt. should build neither mandir nor mosque... they should buid a momentos. for n unity of hindu and muslim which build an example for the world,

n another best isdea jst build a army based there...
?
2010-09-23 06:15:41 UTC
This is to become another thorny issue more like the Kashmir one .The verdict what come how come must be immediate.Postponing the issue makes it more dicey for the future.
SHIVA
2010-09-23 03:01:13 UTC
As responsible citizens, how should we react towards the verdict of the Ayodhya dispute?



We the common man are law abiding citizen that is why we will respect the verdict .



But how political parties will react for it is big question.



They will be the real judge .
2010-09-28 01:19:48 UTC
respect the verdict irrespective of our religion!

respect every other religion!
Vishwanathan
2010-09-27 10:03:26 UTC
we need not show any type of reactions.................we leave it in the hands of justice..........and by the way this is not final.....this is just in high court........whoever loses will take this to the supreme court.....any another 10 to 15 years of case n finally there wont b people to care which ever side wins..................
masaya
2010-09-24 12:38:54 UTC
Not by naming convention A muslim has to be muslim and hindu has to follow his religion

folloing the religion is the eradication of all the sickness...Problem is we don't know the essence of the RELIGION---
?
2010-09-23 08:18:10 UTC
As responsibility we must go with humanity 1SRT.Than think some good for nation
Ashwani
2010-10-02 08:23:27 UTC
we should respect the verdict even we are not satisfied with it.
Amarnath C
2010-09-25 16:20:54 UTC
At this juncture ...no comments pl.

Just wait for the ''VERDICT.''

All the best.
A.K.K.
2010-09-30 21:27:44 UTC
i believe that decision shouldbe fair and right.i truly feel that god is one so
2010-09-30 02:52:06 UTC
whatever the result may need to maintain peace.
2010-10-02 01:37:49 UTC
We should welcome the judgment... we should not spread rumors... and try to force to create a condition to disturb the situation... Rumors lead to riots and violence....

We should all decide peacefully.. No solutions comes through violence...
odampully
2010-09-30 01:29:46 UTC
Prohibit all religions in that place and start a University there....is my opinion.
Maharaj K
2010-09-27 01:27:21 UTC
IN A SECULAR WAY.

INDIA IS A SECULAR COUNTRY,A SOVEREIGN STATE AND WE ALL ARE ITS RESPONSIBLE CITIZENS IRRESPECTIVE OF RELIGION,CASTE AND CREED.WE SHOULD NOT FORGET DESPITE VARIED INTERESTS ,WE ARE ONE.WE HAVE NO PLACE FOR HATE AND INDISCIPLINE.

"AHIMSA PARMO DHARMA" IS OUR MOTTO AND SOLE AIM.ONLY THEN WE CAN LIVE PEASEFULLY
?
2010-09-26 06:57:27 UTC
whatever our judicial system decides we must respect it must try to maintain peace in the whole nation.

when we have learned to fly like birds,swim like fishes then why cant we live in complete brotherhood.

for me most respectful religion is humanity.
2010-09-23 10:36:17 UTC
I think this verdict is going to be long . in my opinion there is no mandir and no masjid at all.there must be made a park,hospital or any other as it become a public place.... and used by all hindu and muslim......
Pushkar
2010-10-03 04:00:31 UTC
You shouldn't care for it as it was simply a case of land.
Duke of Bhopal
2010-10-03 01:21:20 UTC
Past is PAST



Look for TODAY



& FUTURE INDIA



(Live like brotherhood)
?
2010-10-01 20:32:13 UTC
Rule of law should prevail , no matter what are the stakes .
Mohsin
2010-09-29 07:36:26 UTC
Don't think the judgement will be anounced tommorow even..
2010-09-28 23:49:38 UTC
we live in a Democratic country .......... which means different culture's and religion's living together ......

what ever the result comes ............ every one should realize that SABKA MALIK EK HAI ........

when god has not make any differences in all human beings, than who we r to make difference in his creations?
2010-10-04 13:54:20 UTC
Accept it
?
2010-09-28 22:47:46 UTC
you know what happens....

=============

what ever the judgemnet is... never mind....

before the judgemnet day .. be prepare...

collect ur enemies list...

collect ur fav girs/womens list.

watch all their movemnet... and keep track where they are in present.

get ur arms ready.



on the judgemnt day...

cancel all ur assignemtns .. be ready....

after judgement....

kill all ur enemies... not only enemies but thier neighbors too as may as possible...

rape the girls/womens who u likes... thier nighbours too....

possible kill them too....



all this will come in account of judgement day tragedy....

ur enemies died... u got the women who u wants..

u enjoyed a lot.. but u will never suspected....

===========================

this what happends ....
Devil-heart
2010-10-04 10:21:15 UTC
not to react at all is the best choice.
razor's edge
2010-09-28 23:53:07 UTC
Even if it is not in your favour, it doesn't make any sense to make harm to public properties.
?
2010-09-28 23:01:44 UTC
RESPECT THE VERDICT
Fizzu
2010-10-04 02:51:34 UTC
we shoul respect the decision and maintain piece in our country
?
2010-09-30 03:21:29 UTC
we should leave this matter , now a days only teenagers are becoming news makers, so we must leave this until world destroyed.....
2010-09-29 05:18:24 UTC
No comments
chinnababu
2010-09-23 09:35:02 UTC
Any responsible believer of ram have to built temple in their heart because ram belongs to all not only in Ayodhya.Please don't give importance to one particulars place.Peace is ultimate solution to any problem.
Hello H
2010-09-28 06:07:51 UTC
The problem begins when we start reacting....doesnt it?
?
2010-10-01 05:28:07 UTC
plz i am not understanding the meaning of "manyata" is ram does not exist becoze all are saying this is our manyata
Gandalf Dagre
2010-10-03 08:00:32 UTC
We must all eat dal and chapati
heston
2010-10-02 23:02:45 UTC
we should always have 1 ans for such instances that is PEACE
?
2010-09-29 06:30:36 UTC
respect the judgment of court n be coooooooooolllllllllllllllll
Honey786
2010-09-28 01:10:49 UTC
We may love to each other.
?
2010-10-05 00:08:25 UTC
its not about the religion issues .............................we should be together and the court given the result she good for all the people
jaskeerat
2010-10-04 23:43:47 UTC
WE SHOULD RESPECT THE COURT VERDICT

WE HAVE LOTS TO DO FOR DEVELOPMENT
VIGNESh
2010-09-23 11:07:28 UTC
let law take its toll.. as citizens of india let us abide the law.....
Spirit Of Unity
2010-09-25 03:40:29 UTC
We should accept it peacfully and should never raise this issue again.
Raj
2010-09-24 06:24:19 UTC
One easy solution. Just become an atheist. You will not worry about judgement.
?
2010-09-23 03:45:31 UTC
You hold / control your immediate reactions at least for next 7 days.
2010-09-26 05:39:15 UTC
i think that we should be satisfied with whatever the judgement comes
Rup B
2010-10-02 08:04:10 UTC
By not reacting to it at all.
Truly Indian
2010-09-23 05:33:01 UTC
we should respect the verdict
deNdroN
2010-09-30 02:44:13 UTC
our reaction is definitely not needed.......



be neutral and continue ur work
earunie
2010-09-27 03:20:50 UTC
Stay calm.
Ballo
2010-09-25 18:21:58 UTC
Ram mandir Baber ,who desroyed n built masjid....Now we will built ram mandir over it.These netas

are after vote bank n want to make hindu as minority by objecting it to please one group,
nomoreiaminthisworld
2010-09-23 10:56:11 UTC
It should be based on true facts.
?
2010-09-25 02:50:22 UTC
I know people have matured enough, not yet is our politicians. I request them to please dont make any issue of it. Let us live in peace and harmony.

Thanks.
?
2010-10-03 21:32:43 UTC
This is difficult problem.
Capt. Jack Sparrow
2010-09-23 05:55:19 UTC
Whatever may be the verdict.. We are developing country, should not fight for such issues anymore. There's hell lot of issues to address in our country.



Ex: Poverty, Corruption, Population, Lack of funds, Infrastructure development etc..



Lets fight against these issues not fight each other...



Makes sense?????
2010-09-23 02:35:58 UTC
well....ppl are seen discussing this irrelevant issue across d country but not many r actually interested in whats going on and whatever d decision will b country's youth isn't really interested in it..........

tym now has changed a lot frm when all this blunder actually started and now it personally dont matter 2 majority of us whatever d decision may b .No 1 likes riots or violence and we seriously r need of keeping ourselves off these nonsense.

i'll appeal each 1 to just b as normal as u usually are on the issue of this verdict...........and plzzzz don lend your ears 2 useless rumors.....just try 2 maintain peace in d country coz ppl who die in these riots r neither hindus nor muslims but they r ordinary indians ..they r sum one's father , brother or husband or son.........so plzzzz respect d decision of the law court and just dont react in any blunderbuss manner...............................!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Subhasis K
2010-10-03 04:36:32 UTC
accept it, maintain peace, never spread any rumors and then eventually forget it!!!!!!!!!!
2010-09-23 11:21:27 UTC
I will enjoy the situation.
mehtaap56
2010-09-23 11:00:41 UTC
As responsible citizen ?

OK !

I can't tolerate injustice to anyone.

Then how I can allow a Mosque there?

What is Babar for our country ?A looter.

And Ram ?

And we respect that place as His birth place.

But we should watch the legal process peacefully.
AALUNGA >>RETURNS
2010-09-23 07:59:25 UTC
Well!!!!!!



We should respect the verdict....



But, MY honest opinion is :



Ayodhya neither needs a Temple for Ram nor a Mosque at that location..

Both will lead to controversies...



Hence, it is better if they build a monument there in honour of (for remembrance of ) those who lost their lives during the post- Mosque demolition riot!!
RNPKB
2010-09-23 04:20:56 UTC
TRUTH MUST PREVAIL



One must agree with history.

No one can deny that Baber was invader and a terrorists . The community which is asking others to remain calm and to behave responsibly is the same which caused partition of the country. They behave and act as if this country belongs to them. Of course politicians can not remain silent.



There was Mandir , there was setu, there was Dwarika and so on. There is limit for tolerence also.
2010-09-28 04:49:45 UTC
Let NOT ANYTHING snap our 'love & respect'.

NOTHING is ever above mutual ""LOVE & RESPECT"".
?
2010-09-26 09:59:11 UTC
nice or mean depens how much people are killed
Comrade
2010-09-23 03:36:56 UTC
Well it is gonna be a important day tomorrow. I guess it may be against saffron terrorism. We should accept the result whatever it may be and pave way for good democracy
Veers த‌மி‌ழ்
2010-09-23 02:38:53 UTC
Accept with due respects towards Judiciary.



If the verdict is not acceptable also, stay calm and appeal in Supreme court for remedy!

Give & Take policy on both sides will bring religious harmony. All religions preach Give & Take Policy!
2010-09-23 02:34:06 UTC
Everyone Has their own rights to follow, but we must follow it without loosing harmony in our multireligious country. if u want appeal against the verdict go for supreme court .please dont spoil the innocents...
?
2010-10-03 19:21:59 UTC
I am not sure
SUBASH K
2010-10-03 02:45:14 UTC
every citizen will welcome the verdict. and i am one among them.
?
2010-09-25 04:30:27 UTC
mandir or masji, we need development
2010-09-23 11:16:41 UTC
I can't disclose my cards.
tofffees
2010-09-29 22:21:21 UTC
There are so many many other problems to worry about.........floods ,disease,hunger,slums,....................
subbu
2010-09-24 04:51:44 UTC
mouth and ears tightly closed.
sunny0909
2010-09-23 15:51:20 UTC
IF ur hindu and it comes in the favour of hindus than chill

IF ur hindu and it comes in the favour of muslims than vote for BJP in 2014

IF ur muslim and it comes in the favour of hindu than sit in ur home do not do any thing

IF ur muslim and it comes in the favour of muslim than u should b ashamed of your self
Jai Shri Krishna
2010-09-23 08:25:58 UTC
firstly I don't understand the ideas that muslims have ....they can come here and build a mosque in sacred ayodhya and they don't let us build a temple in mecca do they ?



just stating a fact that its not fair what they do to the rest of the world ..they expect the world to run according to their wimps and fancies !

by all means the media should not unnecessarily hype things up ,because then the people start to feel that they may be a part of this big decision even though they could not be more remotely connected ..any anti social activity must be reported
Mark
2010-10-04 04:49:08 UTC
i think u think
?
2010-09-29 03:23:59 UTC
we should not do social practises.
prasad
2010-09-27 23:56:19 UTC
it disputes ........... all indians are one so its all rubbish
2010-09-26 03:14:33 UTC
be calm.. answer mine https://answersrip.com/question/index?qid=20100925052621AARnGOU
Buzzzbe
2010-09-23 09:22:59 UTC
Rama and Mohammed didn't want a worship place there.

They don't like to dwell among a stiffnecked and hard hearted people.



Level the place for other useful purpose.
UNITED
2010-09-27 04:51:44 UTC
IGNORE
m
2010-09-23 03:55:46 UTC
iT is matter of national shame, that a Temple which is centre is hindus faith, is waiting for court judgment. Muslims r already treated as1st citizen of INDIA by all governments. All their faith signs r accepted and protected by all hindus and government.

It is well established , that place is ancient Ram temple, and that was not used for worship by Muslims. Then why Muslim leaders r making issue for that place?
?
2010-09-23 10:49:53 UTC
should ?

i would not allow a masjid there.
?
2010-09-23 03:12:18 UTC
Ignore it.
?
2010-09-23 02:17:03 UTC
stay calm
?
2010-09-29 10:57:21 UTC
CHINESE PEOPLE
Om Prakash P
2010-09-23 10:44:31 UTC
implementoforderdated24.09.2010passedbyhonb.highcourt
?
2010-09-26 15:43:42 UTC
what??????????????????


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...