Question:
Why are people against Obama when unemployment rate actually went down in the last couple of years?
makeusstrong
2012-10-28 09:53:56 UTC
Take a look
http://www.businessinsider.com/heres-the-one-unemployment-rate-jobs-chart-obama-will-use-to-win-reelection-2011-12

I know it's months ago but this is less than a year old. The rate is lower than it used to be and it'll come back up if Romney is president. If he is, we might as well say "Wecome back, George W. Bush"! Romney only cares about rich people, he doesn't care about the middle class or lower class families.
Twelve answers:
?
2012-10-28 16:43:31 UTC
OBAMA lies about his name his school records place of birth and his homosexuality He has lied about Benghazi since day one He is a pathological liar who steps over dead heroes to reach his desires
† PRAY †
2012-10-28 10:09:44 UTC
People have taken min wage jobs and are underemployed plus many of the people have run out of unemployment benefits and that is what the numbers are based on. This is a false report in that sense because of how they determine the numbers.

I see lots of houses empty and have friends back living with parents and bunching up in homes as prices go up and wages go down.

The economy is in the basement and Romney at least can fix that.

Obama will not stop spending and this debt of 17 trillion is unacceptable. Bush was bad but Obama is worse than Bush.

Obama is also guilty for the gasoline prices under $2 when he took office & now over $5 here in CA.

Obama has voted against the pipeline and drilling in the US and has given money to foreign countries to develop their resources..

He is pushing a cap & trade tax that will tax us for the energy we use and give the money to 3rd world nations .. He calls this redistribution of the wealth. Taking it from us and giving it to those that didn't work for it.

P
sailorbeavis
2012-10-28 10:22:47 UTC
There are many people who just don't like him, and no matter what the numbers say, they won't vote for him. I knew a lot of people in the 1996 election that voted against Bill Clinton, not because they loved Bob Dole, but because they hated Hillary. They'd never met her, never spoken to her (she's very personable, BTW), but they went with their gut.



Similarly, many people I've talked to who say they are voting for Romney are not anti-Obama. They like Obama personally. But they hold a longing in their hearts for a time long gone by, when America was both the breadbasket and the manufacturing center of the world, when everybody respected us and we could safely demagogue those who didn't. I have one particular friend who, when Obama said in the debate that "some of those jobs are not coming back," swore that he would never vote Democratic again. He extrapolated Obama's words to mean that America would no longer try to compete with the rest of the world. Not surprisingly, he used to work in manufacturing and he's currently unemployed due to overall contraction in the sector after the recession. He's too young to retire, too old to "learn new tricks."



Those are the people who Romney's rhetoric speaks to. They may not agree with Paul Ryan's budget or the neo-conservative foreign policy, but they know one thing: They liked what they heard about a "New American Century", whatever the hell that means.



Of course, they do forget that in the 1940s and 1950s, when America was on top of the world, it was only because the rest of the world was in ruins. And we were the ones who rebuilt it.
johntrottier
2012-10-28 13:17:42 UTC
The numbers you are quoting are a complete sham.

As this story makes very clear, the numbers we see reported are whatever the administration wants them to be. By "excluding" certain groups, the numbers can be made far more palatable, even if they are totally misleading

http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/breakout/unemployment-rate-farce-needs-fixing-rep-duncan-hunter-113437674.html

And this man ought to know, as he is Congressman Duncan Hunter, part of the establishment that creates these numbers



If we used the same methodology as was used by the Carter Administration, unemployment would be around 16% and inflation over 12%.

Making this "downturn" worse than the one that ended the Carter Administration.



It's bad enough that this administration has horribly mismanaged this economy. When they lie to us about it, it's time they leave



Vote in November

Throw the bums out
Lupines
2012-10-28 10:52:08 UTC
You know I think some people just like to settle for mediocrity. I remember being fresh out of High School in the 80s and working my way up the ladder in the CA high tech boom. By 25 years old in 1985 I was making 16.00 an hour. That ceiling eventually burst.



Nowadays kids can't go fresh out of college and expect more than a minimum wage job. They're competing with older experienced workers who are also in a minimum wage slump if they're able to find a job at all.



The ceiling bursts as noted, but the bottom also drops out that people need to also recognize (as we've seen with Greece and other nations,) so things like this really go both ways. We can't sustain such an economic "slump" indefinitely. Eventually something is going to have to be done that works.



As far as the figures you put out which are old, it was already noted recently that California, was late to report, and thus skewed the latest figures to show a slight improvement in national figures. Its already been reported that Californians are exiting the state in droves.



As far as your claim that Romney doesn't care is simplistic and ridiculous. Both candidates "care" but have posed different means to coming about the same end, the goal of fixing the economy and giving everyone jobs. We need to have an actual intellectual discussion to find the candidate with the right program, one that will actually be effective to get that job done instead of a stereotypical play on someone's emotions and fears.



Obama said in his first campaign he'd knock the unemployment down by half, which was never done, and tackle the deficit, which grew higher or he would be a one termer. His programs haven't proven to be effective and there are more people in dire straights, 47mil on food stamps now than there were at the start of his Presidency. He promised to unite people but he never did that, he plays the blame game and now wants four more years. Well I hold him to his campaign promises then not a promise it will be better in four more years.



Romney on the other hand is a proven bipartisan uniter shown to accomplish his tasks with substantial economic experience. He doesn't believe in socialism re-distribution. Romney still believes in the American dream that made our nation great where through people's hard work the sky is the limit. He's got an economic 5 point plan and I encourage people to read it in depth, an excerpt here: http://www.mittromney.com/



"Mitt Romney’s Plan for a Stronger Middle Class is a five-part proposal for turning around the economy and delivering more jobs and more take-home pay for American families. While President Obama continues looking to big government spending programs as the solution to the nation’s challenges, Mitt understands that it is hardworking Americans in the private sector who will achieve economic growth and job creation. His plan will end the middle class squeeze of declining incomes and rising prices, bring back prosperity, and create 12 million jobs during his first term."



Honestly, America is such a great nation we've had our ups and our downs before. We don't have to settle for mediocrity. We don't have to settle for re-distribution socialism we can still have the American dream.
Gorkbark Porkduke Gefunken Fubar
2012-10-28 13:34:54 UTC
This chart is totally bogus. They way they compute these numbers is tantamount to criminal deception. Real unemployment is more like 15% to 25%, not the ridiculous numbers the government uses. I don't think anybody really believes the lies coming from the government. You've got millions of people in this country who lost their jobs and will never get another one in their lifetimes, and they are not even counted.
Andrew S Calm before the storm
2012-10-28 10:21:02 UTC
Real unemployment in the U.S. has not gone down. Obama also claimed that federal spending slowed. LOL Your statement is a testament to the fact that Obama is an extraordinarily talented confidence man worthy of at least 2 Academy Awards. In fact I don't believe I have ever seen anyone lie as smoothly and continuously as he does.
?
2016-10-04 19:41:29 UTC
I trust Dream Shadow; the president could have planned a greater suitable thank you to spend the stimulus than he did yet ultimately there is not any thank you to get this u . s . a . out of debt for unfastened, so funds might could be "regrettably" borrowed to rebuild it returned up and how the president is going to pay off the hot debt is via capping human beings like his cabinet, and forcing the better type to pay greater taxes. it rather is only elementary ya be responsive to?
Halo Mom
2012-10-28 10:59:49 UTC
People forgot that it was Bush that cause this problem

No matter if McCain or Obama won, this would of been just as bad



Bush deregulated the baking and investment again



Regan/Bush SR deregulated that, and a mess with the economy happen

Clint put regulations back, things got better

Bush JR took them away, same thing happen, but worst

Obama put them back

Romney will take the regulation off again, I wonder what kind of mess that will cause down the line
anonymous
2012-10-28 11:01:56 UTC
I hope Mr Obama wins the election for the sake of democracy in USA and the peace of he world, Romney will care only about the 53% rich and white middle classes he will I believe be a disaster for

world peace, Voters need to think carefully.
bgee2001ca
2012-10-28 10:00:12 UTC
There are people who hate him, and will manufacture their own facts to discredit him.

Much of what he has done has benefited working people, and that is why I want him to win a second term.

A lot of the legislation he tried to get passed was blocked by the Republicans.
tanakprd
2012-10-28 10:03:59 UTC
People are not against Obama , soon the world would see.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...