Will this proposed US ban stop all dialogue on possible government corruption?

Question

The Obama government has practically admitted entering chat rooms to put out false information to combat anyone with "conspiracy theories":..In other words, do not dare to discuss evidence which reveals government or corporate corruption.


"In a lengthy academic paper, President Obama's regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, argued the U.S. government should ban 'conspiracy theorising.'
Among the beliefs Sunstein would ban is advocating that the theory of global warming is a deliberate fraud. Sunstein also recommended the government send agents to infiltrate 'extremists who supply conspiracy theories'...

...In the 30-page paper -- obtained and reviewed by WorldNetDaily -- Sunstein argues the best government response to 'conspiracy theories' is 'cognitive infiltration of extremist groups.'

Continued Sunstein: 'We suggest a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists...by planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts...

Sunstein said government agents 'might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action.'"

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=121884

People like Kurt Haskell could be deemed conspiracy theorists and then countered by Obama officials in chat rooms and blogs, which is exactly what Haskell thinks is taking place to discredit him. Those groups of concerned individuals investigating corruption and government cover-ups could be infiltrated and side-tracked.

So an academic paper is proposing that watching the following video (which clearly shows the "demolition factor" of the twin towers) shall be considered 'extremist' and a government funded group of agents shall infiltrate and attempt to confuse those investigating such topics.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2361717427531377078#docid=-9127706080717077488

Or, daring to question bogus 'Pandemic' flu declarations, shall be 'dissed' by paid government agents and called 'conspiracy theories'. In other words, do not question or think outside of the televised/created version of things....or you shall be marginalised and made to look the fool..

Answer 1

Wow your appear to be heading down the same road as us in the UK. LOL

Answer 2

as long as we proceed to perpetuate a society wherein one guy or woman can carry skill over yet another, then no. the 1st step to removing corruption could be to do away with distant places money, and then to critically limit the privilege of possessing (land, materials, materials, etc). Freedom would not equate to possessing a collection of stuff, it rather is probably going what maximum of my fellow voters think of... whether, i think very strongly that that's rather attainable to have a corruption-unfastened government. while the final public of the loads mutually settle directly to end being pawns of the rich elite of their infinite administration interest, concurrently identifying to no longer commerce in the previous equipment for a distinctive version of a similar situation, shall we delight in genuine peace and genuine freedom. that's far-fetched, I admit, yet attainable even with the undeniable fact that.

Answer 3

There's no stopping corruption in any Government. It has gone on for centuries and will continue to do so regardless of some air headed ban.

Answer 4

I love that people have time to worry about garbage like this.